2. The signing system itself also needs to be improved and perfected. As far as the whole society is concerned, the basic function of the contract system is to make people have stable behavior expectations, thus reducing the "transaction cost", and so is the employment agreement for graduates. It expresses the wishes of graduates and employers through contracts, thus standardizing the behaviors of both the supply and demand sides, enabling graduates to start work as soon as they leave school, reducing the losses caused by "friction unemployment", and also making use of employers to make plans for the allocation of people, money and materials in advance, thus reducing employment costs. Even when the employment of graduates is completely market-oriented, the employment agreement has its existence value. However, the current signing system needs to be improved in specific details. Mainly highlighted in several aspects:
First of all, the content of the agreement needs to be standardized. The employment agreement only initially establishes the labor relationship between graduates and employers, and the rights and obligations of both parties are not clear. Although both parties can agree, because there is no mandatory legal provision, the agreement is often invalid. The employment agreement cannot clearly stipulate the core contents of the labor contract, such as the place of employment, the nature of work, the remuneration for work, and the initial service period. , and can not effectively reduce the blind signing and the resulting breach of contract. Under the current employment mode of college students, although the establishment of labor relations between graduates and employers still needs the certification of schools and employment management departments, which has a certain administrative color under the planned system, this certification is only reflected in the audit of employment industries and employment regions, and schools and competent departments cannot regulate and supervise students' treatment and working years within the current prescribed authority.
Second, the rights and interests of students need to be protected. First of all, there are many restrictions on students in the agreement, but there are often few restrictions on employers. Agreements often only stipulate the service period of graduates and the unilateral liability for breach of contract, and rarely specify the employer's liability for breach of contract. From the legal point of view, this unequal clause is obviously unfair to students. Moreover, if the employer breaches the contract and there is no written agreement in advance, it is difficult for students to apply for labor arbitration or seek legal aid in court with this agreement. Secondly, agreements and labor contracts are often not timely and effectively linked, and the rights and interests of graduates are damaged from time to time. The employment agreement is a written agreement to determine the employer's employment of graduates, and the labor contract is a written agreement to clarify the specific rights and obligations between the employee and the employer. There are great similarities between them, but there are also great differences. Their differences are reflected in their different subject nature, different time periods, different provisions details and so on. It is precisely because of these differences that some employers do not sign labor contracts after graduates report for duty, which damages the rights and interests of graduates. Thirdly, it is debatable whether it is reasonable to continue to implement the relevant provisions of signing contracts under the current situation. For example, the employment service period system, graduate service period system is a national regulation under the planned system. At that time, students basically received free university education and had to serve the country for a certain number of years after graduation. However, after the implementation of the charging system in higher education, the scope and time of students' employment should no longer be restricted. For some reasons (such as preventing brain drain), employers cannot sign labor contracts with students for more than five years under the guise of expired documents.