Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Which is better, the history of China at Harvard or the history of China at Cambridge?
Which is better, the history of China at Harvard or the history of China at Cambridge?
The history of China in Cambridge is better.

1. Academic reputation and research resources: Cambridge University is one of the world-renowned institutions of higher learning, and the discipline of China history enjoys a high reputation in academic circles. The research on the history of China in Cambridge University is rich in research resources and academic support, including libraries, archives and opportunities for cooperation with other scholars. In contrast, Harvard's history of China is inferior to Cambridge's in academic reputation and research resources.

2. Teaching quality and faculty: Cambridge University has excellent teaching quality and strong faculty. China history professors and researchers at Cambridge University have profound academic attainments and rich teaching experience in this field, and can provide high-level teaching and guidance. In contrast, the teaching quality and faculty of China history in Harvard are not as good as those in Cambridge.

Related articles
  • Bibliography of Postgraduate Entrance Examination of Applied Economics in Jiangnan University
  • When is 20 12 Fushun Science and Technology Week?
  • 20 1 1 On-site confirmation of postgraduate registration in South China Normal University
  • University Youth League Committee accepts new press release
  • What does Associate Professor Xidian Elite mean?
  • Is it necessary for universities to have a good relationship with their classmates?
  • Twitter funeral university
  • Tuition for Chinese-foreign cooperation in running schools in Hebei University of Science and Technology
  • What universities are there in Xiasha?
  • What is the insect major in the university?

    • copyright 2024 Education and Training Encyclopedia All rights reserved