Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - University rankings - Henan University of Science and Technology co-lives, why are students dissatisfied with the dormitory reform?
Henan University of Science and Technology co-lives, why are students dissatisfied with the dormitory reform?
Recently, Henan University of Science and Technology announced the reform of its dormitory, and identified two colleges, Li Zhenghe and Heluo. Each college is mixed with three students of different majors and grades. Men and women live in the same building, girls live in the lower floors and boys live in the upper floors.

This move caused strong dissatisfaction among the students of the school, and they vomited the wonderful regulations of the school on the Internet. Henan University of Science and Technology is mixed? Top of the hot search list.

Recently, a teacher Li from the Student Affairs Office of Henan University of Science and Technology responded that students may be worried about the dormitory of the school because they were not at school when the epidemic occurred. Academy system? The reform led to misunderstanding. The purpose of the school is to build community dormitories, and concentrate more majors in several dormitories as communities, which is convenient for students of different majors to exchange and discuss, and also convenient for counselors and academic tutors to live in dormitories. This move cannot be simply understood as? Mixed gender? .

After the school responded, the students' spit became more intense. The students said that the school's response was vague about the key points, and it was obvious that it was easy to avoid the important points. They are not only against men and women living in the same building, but also against other issues.

First, the college reshuffled the dormitory. There are many problems. At present, everyone is in the dormitory of the same college according to their major. We have the same major and lived together for several years. Work and rest hours are roughly the same, and they have also established deep feelings with each other. However, according to the reformed dormitory arrangement, students from different colleges and majors are disrupted and re-divided into dormitories. The following problems may exist:

1, we don't know each other, we need communication costs to get familiar with each other again, communicate with others and build trust.

2. The schedule of work and rest is different. For example, freshmen have to get up early to run and do exercises, some majors have to stay up late to draw pictures, and graduate students have to get up early to review, which is easy to cause conflicts between roommates.

3. Professionally, students of several majors in each college may not be interdisciplinary and cross-knowledge, and it seems that there is not much need to communicate with each other. For example, what can be exchanged in physics, humanities and forensic medicine? However, this has affected the mutual assistance between students of the same major.

Second, during the high temperature and epidemic in summer, does the large-scale relocation of students meet the epidemic prevention regulations? Dormitory reform, * * * involves students from six colleges, and they must complete the relocation before the start of school in autumn. In the hot summer, the temperature in Henan is not low, and now it is the epidemic period. Students from six colleges move to dormitories in a large area, which is easy to cause problems such as gathering and crossing, which does not meet the current epidemic prevention regulations.

In addition, some students need to move over long distances. Does the school have relocation allowance?

Third, do men and women sleep together, considering the safety risks of girls? Most schools are built by boys and girls separately, just to ensure safety and avoid unnecessary harm to girls. But Henan University of Science and Technology wants to mix sexes. what do you think? Do you want boys and students to strengthen communication in the dormitory?

Besides, even if men and women sleep together, shouldn't girls live in the upper class and boys live in the lower class? But they want girls to live on the next floor and boys to live on the first floor. Is it because boys are not safe? Still think that the safety of girls does not need to be considered?

Because the online public opinion is too turbulent, the school has also introduced measures to suppress online comments, putting pressure on students' union members, asking them not to blindly follow suit and correctly guiding students to cooperate with the work of the school and teachers.

My point of view: To carry out reform in schools, we should first listen to students' opinions, instead of deciding the reform alone. Whether a reform is reasonable depends not only on the effect after implementation, but also on whether students can accept it. If most people oppose the reform, it will be unpopular and difficult to implement smoothly.

There are many ways for schools to strengthen exchanges between students from different departments and majors and create compound talents. There is absolutely no need to disrupt the existing dormitory and reshuffle it. Isn't it okay to force students from different departments to gather in one building? Why should students increase the cost of re-communicating and building trust? Twisted melons are not sweet.

During the epidemic, large-scale relocation involving thousands of people is really inappropriate. Will you ask relatives, friends or social workers outside school for help when you move? Can the school ensure that the epidemic prevention and control is foolproof? Reform does not lie in this year and a half.

In addition, the safety of female students must also be considered. It's really not a good idea for men and women to live in the same building. It's really unnecessary. Maybe the school thinks it is too difficult for students to date on campus, which is creating opportunities for students?

In a word, I think the reform of Henan University of Science and Technology has failed before it started, and pushing it hard can only attract more dissatisfaction from students.

Do you think the school did the right thing? Welcome to discuss!