Generally speaking, the scores of college entrance examination vary from province to province. In order to ensure that candidates who quit colleges and universities will not fail, it is generally necessary to wait until the end of undergraduate enrollment, and then publish the scores of colleges and universities (or unpublished) according to the distribution of the scores of the remaining candidates.

Many people think that after the unified proposition of the college entrance examination, the candidates from Tsinghua, Peking University, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shandong will account for the majority, while the candidates from Beijing will be few. This idea is ridiculous.

Why is the current college entrance examination criticized? Is it really that the IQ of Beijing candidates is relatively low? Obviously not, there must be a reason for local protection, or the total score of the college entrance examination is different. A 550 candidate is admitted, and a 650 candidate is admitted. You can't say that 550 candidates are lower just because the province where students live has a total score of 630 and that 650 has a total score of 750, which is not comparable in itself.

Going back to the unification of scores in college entrance examination, I think that children from developed areas such as Beijing and Shanghai finally account for a large proportion in the highest institutions of higher learning, because the scores unify the same proposition, but the educational resources are different, the teachers are different, the investment in family education is different, and the poor areas have no future. The root of educational unfairness lies in the uneven distribution of educational resources. This problem can't be solved, but it can't be solved at present. Let's wash and sleep. There is no justice in this world.