Pay attention to the people under the stage, don't look elsewhere, and pay attention to communication with them.

Treat the audience as students, not teachers.

That's all I thought of. Others added wu_TAo0706 (contact ta in the station), generous, articulate and loud. Don't make mistakes. Almost enough. I think it is more important to choose the content. If you let yourself choose, choose what you are familiar with, so that you will have a psychological bottom when you try to speak. Be fully prepared, and it is best to speak clearly. The following experts may not understand what you are saying, but they will judge whether your teaching method is reasonable or not. Wish you success! Time and rain (contact TA in the station) Thank you for your guidance. The content of the trial lecture provides a general scope, which I don't understand at all. Never touched it before. Alas! Fisherman 1 10 (conTAct ta in the station) Trial lectures are generally equivalent to teacher interviews.

It mainly depends on your appearance and whether you have the potential to be a teacher.

You'd better dress up as an intellectual

In addition, the content of the trial lecture is not what the interviewer pays attention to, but what they pay attention to is the teacher element embodied in your trial lecture.

Of course, you are not familiar with the contents of the trial, and your speech is terrible. No matter how potential a teacher has, it is useless.

The evaluation basis of the trial lecture is generally: 30% knowledge literacy evaluation +70% temperament and spirit evaluation.