First, review what happened. It happened on the first day of school, and Ding Mou, a freshman, didn't line up for dinner at mealtime. At that time, I accused Ding Mou in person. Dante didn't listen to the advice and even swore directly, so someone patted his neck to remind him to eat in an orderly way. So Ding was very excited and directly scolded the person who patted him. So, the three responsible persons dragged Ding out of the canteen together and dragged him to a safe passage for criticism and education.
At that time, the whole thing was reported by the Internet as "a college instructor in Ningxia besieged freshmen". It can also be seen from the picture that Ding had a dispute with three responsible persons, and then the three responsible persons dragged Ding into the safe passage.
At that time, there were still many students eating around, which caused everyone's dissatisfaction. The three responsible persons, who are also teachers of students, violently attacked students in the canteen, casting a shadow over the military training of freshmen. Because of the network effect, the school also made relevant penalties. These three instructors have caused a bad influence in the school and have been suspended.
However, the incident did not end. Later, it was said that, contrary to online rumors, three instructors besieged a freshman, but in order to maintain normal dining order, they forcibly dragged the emotional students out of the canteen. Perhaps their behavior is simple and rude, but this is not a group fight on the internet.
Moreover, the student did not listen to dissuasion when eating, and even directly scolded the instructor and the person in charge. It has hindered the normal dining of other students. If verbal persuasion is useless and no compulsory punishment is imposed, it will inevitably affect others.
Secondly, I think that the reason for this conflict is probably a misunderstanding in words. There is no so-called gang fight in the whole thing, but the dragging behavior of the three instructors is really rude. Many people say: as a student's instructor, you are also a teacher, you should be a teacher, and you should not be so violent. But judging from the whole thing, there may be misunderstandings between the two sides.
First of all, Ding didn't eat according to discipline and was reminded by the person in charge. The possible way of reminding may not satisfy Ding, but it was a pat on Ding's neck, so Ding got angry directly, and the latter happened.
From the instructor's point of view, this is a reminder, maybe just a slap, but from Ding's point of view, this is trampling on his dignity, which is equivalent to slapping himself. Therefore, he disapproved of this practice and then swore. Three instructors thought Ding had impulsive behavior, so they dragged him out of the canteen in order not to interfere with other people's normal dining.
However, the whole thing was spread to the internet and directly evolved into three instructors besieging students. This title is really irritating. After all, the child is underage. Many people commented that how can instructors treat students like this?
Three: personal views. 1, I think the instructor's way is wrong. First of all, instructors should not hit students. There are many ways to remind students to eat normally, which can be verbal persuasion. If persuasion fails, they can respond to the school instead of directly and rudely solving the problem.
Besides, Ding's behavior did not threaten other students. Also, when the instructor reminds the students, don't use a rude slap to remind them. Although the strength is not heavy, it is really a slap in the neck. This in itself makes the parties very angry, and it may be this slap that caused Ding Huo to add fuel to the fire.
Then there is the person who posted the video, out of context. They described a very simple conflict in school as an instructor beating students, which is not correct in itself. Video publishers may just want to get fans and traffic. He witnessed the whole process, but did not describe it clearly, which led to misunderstanding among the audience.
I think: both sides are at fault. In addition, the school has punished three instructors. Imagine if Ding was emotional, didn't listen to advice, and even did harm. Will he wait and see if he doesn't stop it in time? So, after sorting out the whole thing, let's take a look again. The instructor's behavior is only to maintain the normal dining order. If you indulge such a student, no one will eat according to discipline.
Both sides are at fault in the whole thing. The instructor's behavior is really rude, but the students should be warned for disturbing the order, and I think it is understandable that the warning cannot be delayed. Otherwise, it will be too late to stop him when he is disturbed and causes harm.
I think the punishment for stopping work is too heavy. Look at the punishment of the school. Is it unfair to the three instructors? They fired three instructors at once. It's understandable if you are really a student who fights with others, but it's not the case. If you want to leave your job like this, what do you want other instructors to do?
If there are such students again, ignoring discipline, not listening and not obeying, they can only wait and see? Or, when there is bad behavior, slowly feedback to the school? Is it too gentle for students?
I think there is something wrong with the present education. Perhaps it is the current education problem, children can't fight or scold, even if they do something wrong, they are too tolerant to accept children. Therefore, today's children have a particularly strong self-esteem. If someone slaps them in the face to remind them, it will be understood as being beaten. The child's heart is too fragile to bear the pressure.
When we were young, it was not that the teacher was kind and exemplary, but that we did something wrong and the teacher would beat us. As long as it is not serious, it plays a warning role. I think we can fight properly, and there is no need to be so entangled.
But now parents have a strong sense of protection for their children, and feel that no one can touch them except their parents, which makes their children even more unscrupulous in school. Ignore the teacher, ignore the rules, and hold the psychology that you can't hit me anyway. If you hit me, I will post it online and stop your work.
As a teacher, I am also very helpless. Except for a few teachers who beat students, most teachers still focus on education. Therefore, in education, parents did not reach a consensus with teachers, which led to such misunderstanding.
Fourth, my summary. Looking at the whole thing, I think it is still the essence of education. First of all, parents educate their children, not beat and scold. The child's psychology is particularly fragile and can't bear any pressure. He felt that he had trampled on his dignity when others refuted him a little. Someone slapped him lightly and he thought it was a beating.
Nowadays, many children, who are criticized a little at school, will go home and tell their parents, and then their parents will go to school and make a scene, resulting in teachers not knowing how to educate students, not listening to language education and not talking loudly. If you are not careful, you will quarrel.
Let's talk about education from the perspective of students. How to educate children? When a child makes a mistake, he should first give priority to education and not start work. If the circumstances are particularly bad for students, they can only be handed over to the school for handling, and students cannot be beaten privately.
There are many understandings of "beating", and I am particularly impressed. At that time, our students made mistakes and our teachers were very arrogant. That foot went off, and it hurt. If it is now, this kind of play will be understood as violence. Sometimes when the language is not good, I think I can "hit" appropriately, but I should pay attention to my discretion.
In the news, we saw many teachers beating students. It is definitely not possible to beat people to the hospital, but I don't think clapping or clapping should be called violence.
Just like the instructor above, it just patted the student's neck. Some people understand it as beating, others as beating, and there is no trampling on students' dignity. So there may be a misunderstanding of this word. The instructor didn't hit him, but he thought it was an attack on himself.
Also, you can't take it out of context, but evaluate it from beginning to end, otherwise a video that goes against the facts is likely to ruin others' work and affect others.