Today's society pursues all-round development of people, rather than printing knowledge in the mind. What it pursues is to be able to apply what you have learned flexibly and learn to solve problems with what you have learned, instead of taking out a piece of paper and letting people fill in knowledge on it, because many computers can do this by filling in knowledge on the paper.
If a child is brought up by cramming education's education method, his practical ability will be weak, he can't use what he has learned flexibly to solve problems like others, and his thinking is easy to become rigid. For the present job, printing at most is a terrible thing. Because modern occupations need people who are creative and have their own ideas, not people who can only recite.
I think reading is to expand what you have learned through thinking, while learning knowledge is to apply what you have learned, rather than cramming it into your mind. I think it's useless to do so. Of course, it may exercise my memory. But other than that, it seems to be no different from a computer. So I think that if you can't use what you have learned flexibly, what you cram into your mind is just a piece of waste paper.
The biggest difference between people and computers is that people have their own ideas. If they are spoon-fed from childhood, they will turn people into machines, and how can people's memory be comparable to the permanent storage of computers, so that they can attack the strengths of computers with their own shortcomings? How can it be right?