But if I make an analogy, can you think of a better way to solve the education problem in China than exam-oriented education?

The answer is not. Don't underestimate the IQ of everyone, educators and the history of China.

China was the first country to adopt the imperial examination system to select talents. This kind of selection has enriched a group of intellectuals born at the grassroots level, redistributed social and wealth resources, and opened a prosperous era from generation to generation with the IQ and feelings of these intellectuals from the grassroots level.

Therefore, China's examination-oriented education college entrance examination system, although abolished the imperial examination system, is the only way to select talents. However, through the senior high school entrance examination and more standardized examinations, talents have been sent to all walks of life.

It is precisely because exams can change people's opportunities and improve people's wisdom and life through certain channels that exam-oriented education in China becomes particularly important.

To put it bluntly, taking the exam is to deal with the selection and examination.

In history and reality, this kind of selection examination has undoubtedly delivered all kinds of talents for the country. But in details, there is no way for everyone to make the best use of it. This is the exam, which makes many people ignore others and put all their energy into the exam.

Generally speaking, the advantages of exam-oriented education in China definitely outweigh the disadvantages. We still need to improve the details.

For example, there have been elites in education, and the pillars of the country have been selected. Similarly, the high pressure of exam-oriented education has also produced many mentally retarded children. Even in this exam-oriented education, there have been many extreme tragedies, some people are insane and some are antisocial.

Some people say that exam-oriented education should be overthrown. Then as long as there is selection, the education of examination-oriented selection will certainly exist. So this statement does not hold water.

It can only be said that under the existing examination-oriented education, the examination selection should be varied. Training talents should also be multifaceted. Only in this way can we give full play to the advantages of exam-oriented education and try to avoid shortcomings.

Personally, I think exam-oriented education is cruel.

But from the national level, can you propose a better education system than exam-oriented education?

What's the point of education if you fail the exam? How should I choose?

So I agree with exam-oriented education, but I think its details need to be improved. Its direction is to cultivate all-round talents.

Thank you for reading my answer.