Now is a new society, I don't think parents should hit their children. Of course, not hitting children does not mean doting on them, but we need to communicate with them in a better way so as not to get angry. The specific reasons are as follows:

Reason 1: Beating children may make them more and more alienated from their parents.

Yes, since ancient times, there have been sayings that "a stick makes a dutiful son", "if you don't fight, you will defeat the enemy's soldiers" and "if you don't fight, you will defeat the enemy's soldiers". I also admit that "if you don't care about your child, it will go bad, which shows that it is necessary to discipline your child strictly." We know that families are generally two children and one child, so we can understand the significance of opening up two children and three children. So, how can one or two children be willing to fight with grandparents, grandparents and parents? If adults hit children, it is estimated that they will be "hit" by other adults. So now the times have changed, and the ways and means of hitting children in the past have been eliminated. Beating children now will not only fail to achieve the effect of educating children, but will alienate the direct relationship between children and parents.

Reason 2: Beating a child will bring physical and psychological harm to the child.

The extent to which parents beat their children is not equal to their own mistakes, so they will hurt their children. For example, if a child accidentally breaks a bowl, parents will give the child a beating, which is excessive punishment. I remember a video exposed online at the end of last year. A parent slapped his child directly from the back of the head because he didn't drink the drinks given by his parents, and it was still in public. What is the educational significance of this way of beating and scolding children besides bringing brain damage and shadow to their hearts?

Reason 3: Beating children can only blame contradictory short-term repression, and can't completely solve the problem.

Personally, when children make mistakes, it is the laziest and most ineffective way for parents to treat them by beating and cursing. Because for children to make mistakes, simply beating and cursing doesn't need a few brain cells at all, just do it. Parents don't need to spend time learning how to communicate well with their children, nor do they need to learn how to control their temper (you have to control yourself). They just need to vent their anger in the simplest way. This simple and authoritative way of educating children may be effective at present, but it will also bring problems to parents' later education. Because this way will affect the emotional relationship between children and parents, parents need to spend more time and energy to make up for this broken relationship later.

These are the three main reasons why we think parents should not hit their children.

Generally speaking, children should be educated when they make mistakes, but educating children can't be solved by fighting. Almost every situation of beating children can be solved by other more civilized and effective punishment methods. Therefore, in our opinion, in order to let children have a better way to receive education and have a healthier teenager, parents should not beat their children, but should spend more time and energy to learn how to communicate with their children in a more civilized and effective way, completely solve their shortcomings and deficiencies, and guide them to have a healthier and happier teenage life.