Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - What is the contemporary trend of student evaluation theory and practice?
What is the contemporary trend of student evaluation theory and practice?
The trend of modern students's evaluation theory and practice is to advocate the construction of "development-oriented" student evaluation system, replace qualitative evaluation model with quantitative evaluation model, and emphasize authenticity and situational evaluation.

The evaluation object of early education is mainly the teaching field, which takes the evaluation of students' academic achievements as the core, and based on this, judges the advantages and disadvantages of teaching plans and curriculum preparation, and scientifically judges various educational activities, educational processes and educational results under the guidance of certain educational values and according to certain goals by using certain technologies and methods.

1, advocating the construction of developmental student evaluation system-essence.

It should aim at promoting the development of the appraisee and emphasize the cooperation and communication between the appraiser and the appraisee. The appraisal goal should be hierarchical and dynamic, the diversity of the appraisee should be respected, and the appraisal process should be open.

2. Replace quantitative evaluation mode with qualitative evaluation mode.

3. Emphasize the authenticity and background of the assessment background.

Means: performance test and experimental skill teaching test-forming students' understanding ability, explanation ability and creativity-appearance scoring mechanism-substance content mechanism.

4. Encourage students to evaluate the process of cooperative behavior.

5. Pay attention to the evaluation of thinking process.

Types of student assessment:

1, the status quo of diagnostic evaluation is to evaluate in the early stage of educational activities to improve information.

2. Positive feedback is mainly used to improve, adjust and correct education activities in formative evaluation, and its generalization level is low.

3. Distinguishing students after summative evaluation of educational activities has a high level of generalization.