I am very supportive of the People's Daily forwarding the article of China Women's Daily. For example, what is the basic idea of the article forwarded by People's Daily? What should the teacher do if the students make mistakes? Returning the disciplinary power to teachers will be beneficial to the development of education. The importance of returning the disciplinary power to teachers lies in the following points:

1. Education without disciplinary power is doomed to failure. ?

Education must combine leniency with severity in means, and pay equal attention to kindness and prestige. Especially in primary and secondary education, the target of education is a group of half-baked children. It is obviously casting pearls before swine to blindly emphasize convincing people with virtue and reasoning. The ancients have given us enough warning? Jade is uncut, abrasive? In the 1960s, education was repeatedly emphasized? Beating is painful, scolding is love, and it will be even worse if you don't fight or scold. !

2. Overprotection of children directly deprives teachers of their disciplinary power.

A law on the protection of minors is equivalent to directly depriving teachers of the right to punish students, and it is precisely because of this law's excessive protection of teenagers that the original educational order and rules have disappeared! As the saying goes? No rules, Fiona Fang? , education? Rules? If you make a mistake, you will be punished. The reason why there are so many wayward teenagers in society and so many teachers in schools to protect themselves is that this law is too indulgent and lacks the right to education and punishment. ?

3. If the right of education punishment is returned to teachers, there must be laws to follow, and the law on the protection of minors must be amended. On the one hand, to give teachers the right to education and punishment, it needs laws to follow and special legislation. Of course, punishment is well-founded; On the other hand, giving teachers the right to education and punishment cannot conflict with relevant laws. There is no punishment without beating and cursing, which conflicts with the relevant provisions of the law on the protection of minors. If it is not clear, which teacher dares to exercise the right of punishment on students?

In ancient times, school teachers had a ruler to punish unruly students and correct their words and deeds. In fact, this ruler is rarely used by most teachers, but it only plays a deterrent and alert role. Even now, Singapore keeps the whip of the principal for students who make mistakes, and the United States has the right to imprison students. It can be seen that appropriate punishment is necessary. Education without punishment is incomplete, and incomplete education cannot cultivate the sacred duty of the next generation.