Among them, the score of college entrance examination usually accounts for 60% of the total score, the evaluation conclusion of colleges and universities accounts for 30%, and the score of high school level examination accounts for 10%. This comprehensive evaluation enrollment method aims to solve the problem of enrolling some students with special skills but not particularly high scores in the college entrance examination, and also appropriately alleviate the situation that one exam will be fixed for life.
For students with their own specialties, it is equivalent to increasing the chances of getting into a good university with low scores. The main purpose of comprehensive evaluation of college entrance examination is to reflect the overall level of candidates and better identify candidates with extraordinary ability through comprehensive evaluation of their test scores, cultural quality and comprehensive quality.
In order to promote education equity, improve education quality and school level. At the same time, the comprehensive evaluation enrollment system aims to change the single evaluation mode of score theory, so that colleges and universities can fully understand candidates and candidates can fully understand themselves.
In addition to taking the college entrance examination like the ordinary college entrance examination, comprehensive evaluation enrollment also needs to take the school examination, which generally includes interview, written examination, physical education and other links. The examination scope is wide, requiring candidates to improve their knowledge reserve and improvisation ability, and exercise their comprehensive ability, which is also very helpful for future development.
Disadvantages of comprehensive evaluation:
1. There are strict regional restrictions on enrollment: at present, only Guangdong, Shanghai, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and other regions have implemented comprehensive evaluation enrollment, and other regions have not yet carried out it. Therefore, for some candidates, the geographical restrictions are too great.
2. The number of implementing agencies and regions is expanding: nevertheless, the number of implementing agencies and regions for comprehensive evaluation is still limited, which cannot meet the needs of all candidates.
3. The evaluation criteria are not uniform enough: the evaluation criteria of comprehensive evaluation are complicated, including the comprehensive evaluation of candidates' test scores, cultural quality and comprehensive quality. The evaluation criteria are not uniform enough, which may be subjective and unfair.
4. Uncertainty of admission results: The comprehensive evaluation of admission results is influenced by many factors, including the overall level of candidates, enrollment plans, and college assessment standards. So the admission result is uncertain.