There is a gap in the intelligence of primary and secondary school students [including the ability to accept, understand, remember, transfer and solve problems]. It is impossible to ask the students in the same class to be born in the same 45-minute period and have basically the same acceptance of the same teaching content. Students can't, and neither can teachers. Generally, teachers mainly face the middle in class, giving due consideration to both ends. Due to the comprehensive effect of the difficulty of teaching materials, teachers' teaching level and methods, students' intelligence (excluding non-intelligence factors), there will inevitably be a gap in students' acceptance. This is true for a class and a semester. Encouraged by various factors, some students with poor academic performance have made up lessons, hoping to get more targeted explanations and guidance after class in order to catch up with the progress requirements. In addition, some gifted students also have the need to make up lessons, because they don't conform to classroom teaching, and want to broaden and deepen classroom teaching instead of "speculation". Make-up classes organized by the school, either taking new classes or "fried rice", have been opposed by most students and parents. Therefore, making up lessons for schools is to improve it, not to abolish it.
On-the-job teachers' paid "tutorial" has strong pertinence and obvious improvement in their grades, which is welcomed by parents and students. This kind of "tutoring" is mostly a "two-way choice". Teachers exclude students or students expel teachers. Especially paid tutoring for in-service teachers, there are many subjects, not limited to examination subjects. For example, art, calligraphy, vocal music, instrumental music, dance, gymnastics and so on all have "family education". Then, does the paid remedial classes prohibited by the Ministry of Education only prohibit Chinese, mathematics, foreign languages, mathematics and physics, or all of them? Can the Ministry of Education explain why only foreign languages, mathematics and physics are prohibited, and other subjects are not prohibited from making up lessons with compensation? Let's talk about English. Some teachers are good at spoken English, while others are good at listening. Some Chinese teachers specialize in writing, and some political teachers specialize in current affairs. How can the Ministry of Education ban it across the board?
How can your Ministry of Education, department and bureau obtain evidence for in-service teachers to make up lessons in their own homes? You have no right to knock at the teacher's house at night to collect evidence. You can only mobilize students and parents to write accusation materials, or mobilize teachers who don't make up classes to expose the make-up teachers. What a terrible chaotic scene this will be, which will make the school atmosphere even worse!
Some parents want to make up lessons and hate making up lessons. Because the more teachers make up, the higher the fee. This is also an important reason why some parents hate making up classes.
It is a kind of teaching work for schools to organize make-up classes. In other words, according to the needs of teaching, give students more classes outside the schedule. This belongs to the normal work within the scope of school rights. Therefore, the Ministry of Education has no right to prohibit schools from organizing make-up classes. However, the Ministry of Education has the right to prohibit and investigate the behavior of charging tuition fees by schools. Because it is illegal for schools to charge students tuition. Because the fifth paragraph of Article 29 stipulates that schools are obliged to "collect fees in accordance with relevant state regulations". & lt& lt； Article 25 stipulates that "schools shall not collect fees in violation of state regulations". Therefore, the Ministry of Education can only prohibit schools from making up classes with compensation, and cannot prohibit schools from making up classes without compensation.
In the < < education law > >, < <: And> there is no regulation prohibiting teachers from taking part-time jobs. Primary and secondary school teachers, as professional technicians, use their spare time to set up tutoring classes outside school or even at home to meet the special learning needs of some students, which has positive significance and role. It is legitimate to collect service fees, and "paid" is reasonable and legal. Actors can accept invitations to perform, doctors can go out for surgery or open expert clinics, and engineers and technicians can engage in design tasks in their spare time. These are paid services. Why should primary and secondary school teachers be prohibited from engaging in paid tutoring in their spare time? There is no legal basis for prohibiting paid tutoring for primary and secondary school teachers! It can be said that it is the legitimate rights and interests of citizens for primary and secondary school teachers to offer "tutoring" in their spare time. However, it is a kind of "transaction" to charge tuition fees for "tutoring", especially to run a class on a large scale, which is already a kind of "management" behavior. Therefore, it is necessary to apply for a business license from the social education management office and the industrial and commercial administration department of the local education bureau, and declare and pay taxes to the tax authorities. Taxes, tax rates and thresholds shall be determined by tax authorities according to law. It is illegal to not apply for a business license, or not to declare taxes, and it is also against teachers' ethics. Should be punished. This requires the Ministry of Education to formulate regulations jointly with the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and State Taxation Administration of The People's Republic of China.
Schools should not take whether to run classes or engage in paid tutoring as the rules for in-service teachers to create misjudged cases; Instead, we should insist on the actual situation of teachers performing their statutory duties and completing their education and teaching work, and make a decision on whether to hire or not and at which professional and technical post level. As an independent legal person of a public institution, the school can make its own decisions according to the employment contract, and it does not need another "policy" from the higher authorities. This is the problem that the headmaster himself is unqualified and fails to perform his duties.
It has also been suggested that remedial classes for primary and secondary school students should be run entirely by social organizations outside the school, and primary and secondary school teachers should not participate. I think some after-school education institutions do well, but they can't monopolize the market. There is no reason to put the "remedial education market" under the monopoly of off-campus educational institutions. It is also legal and reasonable for school teachers to make up lessons for students in their spare time.
One of the ways to improve the quality of compulsory education is strict quality evaluation, and those who fail to meet the standards in junior high school may not graduate. The junior middle school should establish a strict system of upgrading to undergraduate and repeating, so that students who do not meet the standard of upgrading to undergraduate can repeat. The tuition fee for re-reading is borne by yourself. Re-reading is still not up to standard, and graduation certificates will be issued. Some students failed in the final exam at the end of the school year and had to make up the exam. The school will make up lessons for students who make up lessons in the summer vacation. In order to improve the quality of education, it is necessary to establish a real rather than a mere formality inspection, evaluation and guidance system for primary and secondary school teachers' teaching process. We should advocate teaching a good student, especially taking "changing students" as an important achievement of teachers.
In China's legal system, all "prohibition" and "prohibition" behaviors are destructive behaviors that endanger the country, the people, the nation, the socialist economic and cultural construction, have great harm to the social environment, the natural environment and the ecological environment, and do harm to the lives, property, safety and reputation of others. At present, the Ministry of Education makes up lessons for primary and secondary schools and teachers, which is a teaching activity and a civil act that benefits the people and students.
Education and teaching are teachers' complicated mental work, and teaching and educating people is teachers' lofty mission. Therefore, after the "Cultural Revolution", the party and the state put forward the call of "respecting teachers and attaching importance to education" and formulated a series of policies and measures conducive to "respecting teachers and attaching importance to education". Educational institutions should fully understand the significance of "respecting teachers and attaching importance to education" advocated by the party and the state, and respect teachers' labor. Being emotional when encountering specific problems is a sign of political immaturity.