What do you think of the "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Compulsory Education Quality", which stipulates that schools should not issue entrance examination indicators or publish examination results and rankings? People's Daily Online, Beijing, March 18 (Reporter Sun Jing) Recently, the Ministry of Education and other six departments jointly issued the "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Compulsory Education Quality" (hereinafter referred to as the "Evaluation Guidelines"). In response to the bad tendency of "only grades" and "only entering higher schools" in society, Zhu, deputy director of the Department of Basic Education of the Ministry of Education, said in response to a reporter's question that there was no special evaluation standard for the quality of compulsory education before, and the introduction of this evaluation guide is the standard and basis for the quality evaluation of compulsory education. By establishing scientific evaluation orientations and standards, unscientific and unreasonable evaluation orientations and practices are eliminated.

Zhu introduced that the indicators of the evaluation system in the evaluation guide are basically stipulated in the past, and there are almost no new requirements this time. However, the initial requirements were scattered in various educational laws, documents and policies. This time, it is systematic integration and systematic design around the orientation of quality education.

"We used to have these requirements, but they are more flexible. This time it has become a standard, making this standard more rigid and more difficult to give full play to our role in evaluating the baton. " Zhu said to:

The reporter noted that the "Evaluation Guide" clearly stated that the number of exams should be strictly controlled, test scores and rankings should not be published, and balanced classes should be implemented, regardless of key classes and fast and slow classes. These are all hard requirements. In the county compulsory education quality evaluation system, some key points are also put forward, such as "Don't give the college entrance examination indicators, don't evaluate schools, principals and teachers simply by the enrollment rate", "Don't hold key schools" and "Don't announce and speculate on the number one in the college entrance examination and the enrollment rate".

Zhu pointed out that the quality evaluation index system of compulsory education is all around the orientation of quality education and around reversing the bad tendency of "only scores" and "only enrollment". In the evaluation of students' development quality, we should first make a comprehensive evaluation from five aspects: morality, intelligence, physique, beauty and labor. Secondly, even in the evaluation of students' academic development, it is not limited to academic level, but highlights students' study habits and innovative spirit, laying the foundation for students' comprehensive quality and lifelong development. At the same time, it also changes the simple result evaluation method in the past, pays more attention to value-added evaluation, and comprehensively examines the overall level and changes of students' morality, intelligence, physique, beauty and labor.