1. Abolishing the administrative level of school officials is not conducive to the communication between schools and the government. Primary education funds are mainly financial allocations, and the government has mastered the enrollment plan, and some projects still need government approval. Education needs to be connected with government work, and the government and relevant education departments, as administrative units, have strict grading. In the face of schools with no grades, there will be a series of problems such as what to manage and who to manage.

2. De-administration of primary education is not conducive to the stable and efficient development of schools. Lack of experienced guidance and leadership, put forward leadership principles and principles, leading to the management system saying one thing every day, and the administrative staff working like headless flies everywhere; Democratic control will also bring about problems such as unclear distribution of responsibilities and low efficiency. In addition, after the abolition of the administrative level, the treatment of administrative personnel can not be guaranteed.

3. The de-administration of primary schools is not in line with the current environment. China is a highly administrative society, and the order of higher and lower levels in the administrative environment ensures the efficient work and close cooperation of all departments in the school; And change needs cost. When the cost of change keeps increasing, it is impossible to accurately predict the specific benefits that change can bring.