Which is better, Xiao Li's thinking or zebra thinking?
It is divided into four modules: logical reasoning, number and operation, number and operation, and life application. According to official data, the curriculum system refers to the latest mathematics standards of CCSS in the United States, the Guide to Cognitive Development for Children Aged 3-6 and the Mathematics Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education, and the design is scientific and reasonable.
According to the data in the Cognitive Development Guide for Children Aged 3-6, children aged 5-6 only need to master the addition and subtraction within 10, but in Xiaoli's course "L2 level of AI mathematical thinking" last month, it shows that they have learned the addition and subtraction within 20, which should be mastered by first-year students of People's Education Press.
From now on, Xiaoli's AI mathematical thinking course is advanced, but most of the course contents are still in line with the average level of preschool problems.
Zebra thinking
The content of the course is as suitable for children aged 3-8 as Xiaoli thinks, but there are five grades, which are more detailed and complete than the three grades Xiaoli thinks.
However, parents should pay attention to the fact that the content level that children can learn at present is S 1-S4, because S5-level courses have not been fully developed. If your child is 7-8 years old, there is no need to choose the zebra AI thinking course at present.
Zebra thinking is mainly divided into five modules, namely puzzle games, numbers and operations, life applications, logic and reasoning, graphics and space.
Obviously, zebra thinking has more puzzle game modules, so it is better than Xiao Li Ai in the richness of course content.
In addition to the number of courses, the proportion of course content is also different.
The benefits of thinking education to children 1. Scientists have found that the acquired environment has an influence on children's brain neurons and is also good for children's intellectual development. Through a series of training, children's thinking ability can be improved.
2. "Children's English", "Music Art" and "Olympiad Mathematics" cannot completely replace thinking training. We should have a certain understanding of the training of thinking, which is comprehensive and balanced. To achieve this effect, it must be a well-designed systematic and professional thinking training course.
3. Thinking ability will directly affect children's learning ability and their performance in school. Therefore, the investment thinking ability has a high rate of return.
4. Thinking training is different from instilling knowledge and skills. Thinking training has a short window of opportunity. This window of opportunity corresponds to the rapid development of children's brains, usually at the age of 2-7.