This agreement is completely beneficial to the school. It is conducive to shirking responsibility in the future. It can be said that some overlord clauses are contrary to the regulations of some countries. But some specific aspects still need to consult a lawyer. For example, students are in danger on campus. School teachers themselves have the responsibility of guardianship. It is the responsibility of your parents and guardians to go home in danger. But watching the school means that it is your personal responsibility not to obey the school rules. Put the blame entirely on an underage child. So the teacher has no guardianship responsibility? It is the responsibility of the child to run out of the school gate and have an accident. Why did the school let the children run out? How did the child leave school? These are all caused by management loopholes in the school. A child is a child because he can't control his behavior. Then they need the supervision and protection of teachers. And I didn't see it in this agreement at all. The worker in the factory did not follow the operating rules and had an accident, and he was personally responsible. Because adults have their own thinking and judgment. But if the school requires children according to the rules of adults, it is not appropriate. You can make an appointment with other parents to discuss with the school. If you can't communicate, you can go to the Education Bureau to report the situation.