Make up for what is missing. Finland's continuing education is not based on "academic qualifications"; In other words, the continuing education of enterprises has nothing to do with diplomas; Continuing education focuses on improving practical experience and cultivating the ability to deal with practical problems; Teachers who serve as continuing education are not professors in colleges and universities, but researchers or field engineers in the enterprise research institute of the company; Sometimes there are foreign experts from these multinational companies to teach; The assessment of teaching effect is directly linked to the promotion and salary of employees instead of "punching in" every day to record attendance; To put it bluntly, employees can see the impact of continuing education on their actual income, and the motivation for learning is of course self-evident; The learning content is mainly the operation process and "why", such as the basic requirements of a certain position and why such requirements should be formulated, and what impact will be caused to the next working procedure if such requirements are violated, etc. Continuing education in Finland rarely involves endless foreign language training, such as English proficiency test, and there is no foreign language requirement for hiring engineers. Quite simply, he doesn't need a foreign language for his job.
What can we learn from Finland's youth bridging education?
1, realizing education equity
2. Academic achievements are not ranked, and schools are not ranked.
How about Nanning Hengqi Accounting School?
It's not bad, it's good, ours is also good, both of them are good, each has its own advantages.