Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Which is better, Hua or Zhonggong interview class?
Which is better, Hua or Zhonggong interview class?
Zhonggong feels relatively better.

The interview training of graffiti is more serious, and the traces of routine are more obvious. It is to teach candidates a relatively fixed model to win the world. In this way, the probability of making mistakes in the interview is relatively small, but it is not easy to get high marks. Zhonggong's words are more natural, emphasizing that candidates should sum up their own ideas. Of course, some basic ways and means will still be mentioned, but in general, it is emphasized that candidates should have their own things, which will have higher requirements for candidates themselves and help to fundamentally improve candidates' ability to cope with interviews. The current interview really emphasizes the so-called anti-routine, and the examiner listens to the answer to the same question dozens of times a day. If the trace of routine is too obvious, it is easy to cause the examiner's disgust, which anyone can figure out.

So when it comes to the interview, it is better to be natural, such as "reporting to the leader in time" and "summing up afterwards in time", and it will be better to have more real "dry goods"