At present, in-service teachers are not allowed to make up lessons privately. The specific consequences are as follows: once they are reported to make up lessons privately, their income will be confiscated for the first time, and then informed criticism will be demoted; It was found that the employment was suspended twice and the year-end bonus was cancelled; Teachers who are found three times will be reported to the media in informed criticism, and the Education Bureau will confiscate their teacher qualification certificates and be dismissed by the school. It will even affect the honor of the school. The specific provisions are as follows: Provisions on Prohibiting In-service Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools from Running Classes to Make Up Classes Privately;

First, it is forbidden for in-service teachers in primary and secondary schools to organize students to make up lessons (except "one-on-one" counseling); It is strictly forbidden for in-service teachers in primary and secondary schools to participate in various forms of remedial classes organized by any department, unit or individual without permission; Two, prohibit all kinds of schools to provide places, facilities and other convenient conditions for in-service teachers to make up lessons privately; Three, where in-service teachers privately organize students to make up lessons, after investigation, all the income from running classes to make up lessons will be confiscated; At the same time, it will be verified and notified once in the school to adjust its teaching position; Verified twice, notified in the system, suspended from work, participated in teacher's ethics training, and cancelled the year-end one-time bonus salary; Those who have been notified in the news media for three times after verification shall be dismissed by the administrative department of education; Four, the organization or participate in private make-up classes of teachers in the school to implement a one-vote veto. Upon verification, if there are indeed teachers who illegally organize students to run classes to make up missed lessons, all the qualifications for selecting the best students in their schools in the current year will be cancelled, and informed criticism will be conducted throughout the city. At the same time, for those who do not seriously convey and implement the requirements and regulations of their superiors, neglect the management or supervision of in-service teachers, or provide places, facilities and convenient conditions for private remedial classes, the principal shall be investigated for responsibility, and organizational treatment and disciplinary action shall be given according to the circumstances; Five, each semester in-service teachers privately run classes to make up lessons, the school principal should sign a letter of responsibility with the administrative department of education, the teacher and the principal sign a letter of guarantee, and the teacher representative publicly promises and accepts supervision at the teacher-student meeting of the whole school. ?

Second, typical cases

1, Yancheng Education Bureau-public exposure 1 Typical cases of in-service teachers making up lessons in violation of regulations.

A few days ago, Yancheng Education Bureau publicly exposed the problem of 1 in-service teachers making up classes in violation of regulations.

In May, 20021,Wang Moumou (now an English teacher in junior high school in Yancheng City, whose personnel relationship belongs to Tianjiabing Middle School in Yancheng City) used Sunday afternoon to teach junior high school English to seven students outside the school. Wang's behavior violated the provisions of the Ten Norms of Professional Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Teachers in the New Period. According to the Interim Provisions on Disciplinary Actions of Staff in Institutions, Measures for Dealing with Teachers' Violation of Professional Ethics in Primary and Secondary Schools (revised on 20 18), Notice of the Provincial Department of Education on Printing and Distributing the Implementation Rules for Dealing with Teachers' Violation of Discipline (Su Jiao Gui [2065438+09]1No.) and other relevant regulations, the Wang Party was given a serious warning.

2. Yancheng Education Bureau-publicly exposed four typical cases of in-service teachers making up lessons in violation of regulations.

1. Yao moumou, former vice president of Haihe primary school in Sheyang county, took part-time classes at Smart Tutor, an off-campus training institution at No.72 Fumin Road, Haihe Town, Sheyang county from February to April, 2002/kloc-0, free of charge.

2.202 1 year From February to April, Mao, the vice principal of Wharf Primary School in Sheyang County, was at home in Room 205, Building 1 Warm Home, Teyong Town, Sheyang County. Every Saturday morning at 8: 00 to 1 1, he helps five students in Wharf Primary School with primary school mathematics, without charge and without reporting to the school.

3. From September, 2020 to April, 20021,Fu Moumou, deputy director of the Political and Educational Office of Wharf Primary School in Sheyang County, tutored four students who were teaching at Group 3, Wangcun, Teyong Town, Sheyang County 123. Two of the students were charged 1000 yuan for making up lessons and did not report to the school.

4. Ma Moumou, deputy director of the Political and Educational Department of Matou Primary School in Sheyang County, was at home in Room 202, No.333, Ma Zhong Road, Sheyang County from February 2002 to April 200212002. Every Saturday from 7: 30 am to 10: 30 am, he tutored three students in primary school mathematics, without charge or reporting to the school. On the other night, from Monday to Friday, I will give elementary school mathematics to the students of Wharf Primary School 1 at the cost of 1200 yuan. The fees charged on the day of the investigation were refunded to the parents of the students.

The actions of the above four teachers violated the provisions of the Ten Norms of Professional Conduct for Primary and Secondary School Teachers in the New Period. According to the Interim Provisions on the Punishment of Staff in Public Institutions, the Provisions on Prohibiting Paid Make-up Classes for Primary and Secondary School Teachers and On-the-job Teachers (Shi [2015] No.5), the Measures for Handling Teachers' Violation of Professional Ethics in Primary and Secondary Schools (revised on 20 18) and the Notice of the Provincial Department of Education on Printing and Distributing the Detailed Rules for Handling Teachers' Violation of Discipline (Soviet Canon [20] Yao was granted the following regulations: "Identification and Treatment Measures for In-service Teachers in Primary and Secondary Schools in Yancheng (Trial)" (Yan Jiaofa [2065 438+08] 14) and "Treatment Opinions of Sheyang County Education Bureau on In-service Teachers Engaged in Paid Tutoring" (She Jiaojian [2065 438+04] 10).

The teachers involved in the above-mentioned illegal remedial classes were severely punished, indicating that Sheyang County Education Bureau and related schools thoroughly implemented the ten principles of teachers' professional behavior and held a firm attitude of "zero tolerance" for violations of teachers' morality. All localities and schools should, in accordance with the relevant deployment requirements of the state, provinces and cities, further improve their political positions, intensify investigation and punishment, and resolutely curb the spread of problems such as in-service teachers making up classes in violation of regulations.

Third, the reasons why in-service teachers are not allowed to run cram schools

1. Maintain a harmonious social order.

If the teacher makes up the lessons, the students in the class will not go to the tutoring institution to make up the lessons. These counseling institutions have also provided many jobs for the society. If in-service teachers run cram schools and counseling institutions change careers because of low economic returns, these employees will lose their jobs. In addition, teachers are already paid, and if they also run cram schools to get extra economic income, it will also cause strong dissatisfaction in society. Is not conducive to maintaining a harmonious social order.

2, reduce the quality of the classroom

Making up lessons by teachers is an act of seeking economic benefits, which will inevitably put pressure on parents of students. If in-service teachers run cram schools, they will teach key knowledge and answering skills so that more students can come to cram schools, because this will attract more students in the class to attend cram schools.

The purpose of compulsory education. Is to let everyone receive a relatively fair education. In-service teachers running cram schools undoubtedly broke this fairness, leaving families with average or poor economic ability on thin ice.

3. It is not conducive to students' physical and mental health.

Students in compulsory education are still young. Thought is not yet mature. They often hate a subject because of a teacher. I don't know that such behavior actually hurts my future, whether for the personal development of students or for a family. If in-service teachers run cram schools, they will inadvertently have extra service status for some students in the class, thus treating the students differently. Students who attend his cram school will be more patient and will often ask those students in class. Students will have a better attitude when asking questions and be more careful when answering questions for them. On the other hand, he will be indifferent to the students who do not enroll in his cram school, and will be silent and perfunctory when answering their doubts.

Children in the compulsory stage, because of their young age and very fragile mind, can easily dislike a subject because of a teacher, resulting in weariness. Children who don't make up lessons can't keep up with the teacher's class rhythm. This unfair phenomenon not only increases the financial burden of parents, but also undermines the fairness of compulsory education and greatly harms the physical and mental health of teenagers.