Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - Which is more effective, love education or corporal punishment education? Why?
Which is more effective, love education or corporal punishment education? Why?
There is a tradition in China that a strict teacher makes a noble apprentice and strict father a dutiful son.

But I suggest you change the topic to "Punishment is more effective than love education". After all, it is illegal to advocate corporal punishment now.

Punishment is indeed more immediate than love.

Under the stick comes a dutiful son.

If you don't fight for three days, you will go to the house to uncover the tiles.

South Korea's education law clearly stipulates that schools can punish students who violate school discipline. However, corporal punishment has strict enforcement procedures, and students can apply for doing good deeds for the school instead of corporal punishment to make up for their own mistakes. Although there are many international objections, South Korea still determines the position of corporal punishment in education according to its own national characteristics. I think this is a spirit of seeking truth from facts.

Moderate punishment, including moderate corporal punishment, is of irreplaceable value to minors: to establish their awareness of rules.

We know that there is evil in human nature, and a very important function of education is to suppress evil and promote good, telling them what to do and what not to do. Moreover, let them know that what they should not do will be punished accordingly. In this way, the deterrent effect of punishment makes the parties understand that there is a rule in this society that must be observed, or they will pay the price. This awareness of rules will benefit them for life and society. I think the positive significance of corporal punishment in Korean education is also here.

This is just like when educating children, parents warn them that nagging is the least popular with children. I think it's much more effective to let him suffer a little loss than to say it. When we tell our child that candles can burn people, he often tries. We can either reprimand him severely or drag him away quickly. However, children are often scalded when we are not present or paying attention, which may be very serious. So, I think, before he tries to touch the candle, he'd better tell him that it will burn people. If he has to touch it, let him try. Of course, parents have the responsibility to pay attention to minimize the harm. This painful experience will definitely impress him for life, and there is another concept that you will suffer if you don't listen to your parents' warnings! At first glance, parents seem cruel, but this cruelty is for children to have a correct outlook on life and for their healthy growth. This is true love!

Teachers' punishments, including corporal punishment, are like candles, except that the responsibility of minimizing injuries should be grasped by teachers. But our reality is that the total prohibition of the law makes teachers have no candlelight and can only turn parents' chatter into teachers' chatter. Therefore, some people joked that teachers should have the ability of Tang Priest in a Chinese Odyssey, be able to impress students and be obedient! Jokes have their own bitterness.

Nowadays, one is more rebellious than the other. Your so-called "education of love" can be understood as Tang Priest's mother-in-law and mother-in-law chirping on a Chinese Odyssey.

There is a saying in the northeast that "young trees don't prune their roots, but people don't prune their roots." This is a fact. Proverbs are often more reflective than famous sayings.

Confucius put forward the idea of benevolence, which belongs to the political category. His educational principles are no teaching, no classes and no love for education. Xunzi is also a Confucian scholar. He has a famous saying: the beginning of life and the inherent evil. Yes, love education can really make people change from evil to good, but the effect is obviously not as good as corporal punishment.

Some people may say that corporal punishment may arouse students' more rebellious psychology, which will make them go to a worse side to some extent. But we need to emphasize the principle of moderation.

CCTV once broadcast a program about a studio that educated some teenagers with Internet addiction through a series of activities. There are also routine activities such as hiking-this is not the kind of casual hiking for a spring outing, but the full marching style. This is the moderate corporal punishment that we advocate. During the break, the reporter interviewed some participants. From the interview, I didn't see any rebellious feelings. All I see is obedience and persistence. Besides, those.

It can be concluded that corporal punishment is more effective than love education.

Punishment education can produce "immediate" effect. If used properly, it can maintain the discipline and rules of the school, make students realize their mistakes and correct their shortcomings.

We believe that punishment education is more effective than love education, because persuasion education is not omnipotent now, and how can education be obtained without punishment! Didn't the country run so many prisons to punish criminals? If persuasion education is so effective, is it necessary to go to jail? Besides, the country's powerful propaganda and education machine doesn't work. Why only ask schools and teachers not to punish education, but to educate every student well?

We should know by now that students are competitive and always want to surpass others. When they suffer from failure or punishment, they will wake up from their unpleasant emotional experiences, arouse their self-awareness, learn from them and strive for progress.

For some wayward children, reasoning education alone is ineffective. If we ignore their wrong behavior and let it go, it will undoubtedly be an indulgence for them, and as a result, they will become more and more willful and difficult to control. Therefore, for the sake of children's future, it is necessary to use certain punishment when children make educational mistakes. In addition, the so-called punishment does not mean corporal punishment. There are many ways to punish, and corporal punishment is only a very primitive educational method.

Children nowadays already know your generosity. They won't think you're educating him, they'll just think you're nagging. At this time, your good intentions are useless, and he will become more and more willful and will continue to make the same mistakes. So we insist that punishment education is more effective than love education.

I think it is necessary to punish students appropriately based on the principle of respecting personality. Adults who make mistakes should be punished by public opinion and criminal law, and children who make mistakes should also be punished! Let him know that the probability of making mistakes should be minimized in order to live happily.

For some wayward children, persuasion and education alone is very effective. If you ignore their mistakes and let them go, it is undoubtedly connivance. As a result, it becomes more and more willful and difficult to control. Therefore, for the sake of children's future, it is absolutely necessary to punish children by certain means when they make mistakes in education.

We all went through childhood. You didn't have to make mistakes then, did you? But everyone will give in under his father's bus, and then let his mother wipe away the painful tears for you. At that time, you will sing "Only a mother is good in the world" in your heart and engrave the pain your father gave you in your heart. I don't understand why it hurts so much, but later you will understand that you are lucky to live in a family of "loving mother strict father" and not be the black sheep.

Just as China advocated the rule of virtue, it is more urgent to improve the legal system. For adults, there is an irresistible temptation. Why can students with poor self-control learn well? Then you can't just talk without practice.

Viewpoint 1: Moderate punishment can wake up children who make mistakes and take responsibility for their mistakes.

Viewpoint 2: Punishment has warning function. If a student in a class or a group makes a mistake, the teacher will give him appropriate punishment, which will educate the rest of the students and learn from them.

Viewpoint 3: "Punishment has an incentive effect. Students are competitive and always want to surpass others. When they are punished for failure, they will wake up from unpleasant emotional experiences, arouse self-awareness, and trigger a sense of crisis and anxiety, so as to learn from experience and make continuous progress.

And add a few points:

1, punishment is based on understanding and being kind to students, so that students can understand things, distinguish right from wrong and increase their knowledge in punishment.

2. After students make mistakes, they should discover their enthusiasm through wrong words and deeds, so as to protect their enthusiasm, guide them correctly, and let the bright spots develop.