The interview training of graffiti is more serious, and the traces of routine are more obvious. It is to teach candidates a relatively fixed model to win the world. In this way, the probability of making mistakes in the interview is relatively small, but it is not easy to get high marks. Zhonggong's words are more natural, emphasizing that candidates should sum up their own ideas. Of course, some basic ways and means will still be mentioned, but in general, it is emphasized that candidates should have their own things, which will have higher requirements for candidates themselves and help to fundamentally improve candidates' ability to cope with interviews.
The current interview really emphasizes the so-called anti-routine, and the examiner listens to the answer to the same question dozens of times a day. If the trace of routine is too obvious, it is easy to cause the examiner's disgust, which anyone can figure out. So when it comes to the interview, it is better to be natural, such as "reporting to the leader in time" and "summing up in time afterwards", and it will be better to have more real "dry goods", especially for those candidates who want to make a comeback in the interview. The so-called "bright spot" in the interview is sometimes to put false rhetoric into relatively specific measures. For example, a friend of mine talked about summarizing and reporting in time during the interview. Personally, I think it is very good: "I will record the problems encountered in my work, the solutions and some personal thoughts and suggestions in the form of a work log, so that the leaders can have relatively detailed written materials as a reference when assessing my work. If one day another colleague takes over my job, this log can also help him start working better and faster. "
If the advantage of written test results is obvious and the interview basis is relatively general, you can consider applying for painting, get an upper-middle grade in peace, and end safely; If you are looking forward to the interview, then Zhonggong may be more suitable. Of course, this is purely a personal opinion and is for reference only.
In fact, I think the best way to prepare for the interview is to practice more by yourself. Find a few candidates who want to take part in the interview to do a mock interview, and invite several young civil servants who have been admitted in recent years to be mock examiners. It would be better to invite government officials who have been interviewers. Conduct a mock interview every 2-3 days. The questions will be answered by one candidate, then supplemented by other candidates, and then commented by the examiner. This persistence for two or three weeks can greatly broaden the candidates' thinking and is very effective.