I remember that in the 1970s and 1980s, there were basically no educational institutions of a social nature in society. If both the senior high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination fail, you can choose to repeat in the second year, or you can choose to continue to repeat in the third year or even longer. I remember when I was in high school, a high school student made up for eight years in a row and was finally admitted to the university. Everyone joked that you finally won the eight-year war.

It can be said that in the past, I could only go to regular schools to make up lessons. Now, all kinds of cram schools, talent classes and advanced classes are all over the streets, which provide us with a rich learning environment for us to choose from, whether after school or after school.

This is a manifestation of the development of modern education, meets the needs of people with higher educational needs, can make our education more comprehensive and colorful, and is a manifestation of social progress.

But what I want to say is that when people choose educational institutions, they should do what they can, don't keep up with the competition, and choose educational institutions that match them at what economic level. We must resolutely give up the choice beyond our ability to pay.

The country now implements free education from primary school to senior high school, which really lightens the burden on parents, but compared with the rising tuition fees, it is simply a drop in the bucket. Parents have to pay not only tuition and fees, but also books, in order to participate in various institutions such as extracurricular tutoring, remedial classes and art training.

In other words, if education was not free in the past, some parents now spend more.

So my point is that the free education implemented by the state has promoted the rapid development of social educational institutions to a certain extent. It has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is to meet the needs of people with more educational needs, that is, to meet the needs of well-off parents; Holding back is that parents who have no economic foundation have no conditions to receive a higher level of education and are rejected.