First, more people care about children's education. I don't think this policy in South Korea can motivate people to have children at all, because now more young people care about their children's education. The education cost of children from childhood to adulthood is the focus of many people's concern.
Second, many people are reluctant to have children because it is too difficult to have children. Many people are unwilling to have children, not because they can't afford to rent a house, but because they think it is too difficult to conceive in October and raise the children after birth. This has put a lot of pressure on many young people, especially young women.
Third, the rent of 10 is only waived, which makes many people feel that the pressure has not been alleviated, and only the rent of 10 is waived. What will happen in ten years? This makes many people feel that the pressure cannot be fundamentally relieved. Ten years later, when the children grow up, the house needs to be bigger to meet the needs of the family. Therefore, it is unrealistic to say that just exempting the rent for ten years and trying to encourage people to have children can't achieve the expected results.
What if everyone is right? In Han Guosheng, two children can be exempted from the highest rent of 10. Can this policy motivate people to have children? There are many opinions on this topic. Welcome to comment positively and discuss your views on this topic with us.