To finish your debate, I need the other side's point of view, and then I won't defend you. Debate cannot be prepared by one person. I can only give you a reference train of thought.

First of all, I define my own elite education, which refers to the quality education of a few people. Simply put, it is to reduce the number of college students enrolled each year, improve the teaching level and increase the investment in education.

First of all, it can be demonstrated from the following aspects:

Nowadays, it is difficult for college students to find jobs, precisely because the popular education of college students has made college students flood, and the average quality has declined instead of rising.

Countries are also normal in this respect, such as 985 and 2 1 1, which give priority to the supply of high-quality talents with limited resources.

With the exam-oriented education in China, when the society gives up the blind pursuit of college students, a large number of talents can flow into other technical schools and other industries that are more suitable for them, and the direction of education seems to return to normal.

On the one hand, there is a flood of college students, and on the other hand, there is a shortage of high-tech talents in China, which seriously affects the normal development of society and the country.

Elite education makes it easier for college students to realize the value of life.

Note that the above objects are very messy, whether social or personal. Similarly, sum up your own arguments and fight separately. If you want to have a subject, you can set it up: facing the society and facing the college students themselves.

Finally, I would like to remind you that this is a comparative debate, and giving priority does not mean giving up the other party's point of view (the point you didn't give me). We should stand in the perspective of dialectical comparison and not lack arguments.