Mediation is only conducted on the voluntary basis of the parties, on the basis of finding out the facts and distinguishing right from wrong, and cannot be forced to mediate. If mediation fails or the parties repent before the mediation is served, a judgment shall be made in time. The contents of the mediation agreement cannot violate the relevant laws and harm the legitimate rights and interests of the state, the collective and others, otherwise it should not be confirmed.

? When describing the facts, the conciliation statement generally does not need to distinguish between right and wrong and determine the responsibility. This is because the two sides have reached an agreement on the content of the dispute. But if one party insists on distinguishing right from wrong and defining responsibility, it should also be reflected in fact. In short, it is based on respecting the wishes of the parties.

? If a case in which a mediation agreement has been reached involves a civil act or the contract is invalid, it should not be confirmed in the mediation document, but a separate decision should be made to confirm the civil act or the contract is invalid. This is because the confirmation of the validity and invalidity of a civil act or contract can only be determined by judicial organs, that is, people's courts or other organs (such as arbitration organs) with the right to confirm. Mediation agreement is the embodiment of the voluntary principle of the parties, and has no right to confirm the validity of civil acts or contracts.

? If the parties reach a mediation agreement in the first instance, not all cases must be made into a mediation document. Mediation is not divorced, the adoption relationship is maintained, and mediation is performed immediately. If the parties do not ask for a mediation document, they may not make a mediation document. If it is agreed not to make a conciliation statement, it shall be recorded in the written record, which shall have legal effect after being signed by both parties, judges and clerks. However, in the second instance and retrial, after the parties reach an agreement, they should make a conciliation statement, because it involves the validity of the judgment of the original trial.

? The contents of the conciliation statement should be clear and specific, so as to facilitate the performance of the parties. Mandatory words should not be used in the conciliation statement, nor should educational words without legal substance be written. There is no need to write down the date when the parties have no other disputes and mediation was established. There is no need to revoke the original judgment in the mediation book, because the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that the original judgment shall be revoked after the mediation book of the second instance is served.