At present, there is no good professional definition of liberal education and strict education, and we can follow our own understanding. My understanding is that the so-called strict education is an attitude, and the education of children should be more cautious and gradual. This is not a way, but an attitude. A completely responsible attitude towards children's education. It is not the kind of "cruel" corporal punishment or mental oppression education that leads to the champion under the stick.
Since it is education, mainly for children, the national law stipulates that adults above 18 have the ability to bear all legal responsibilities, which shows that all behaviors and ideas of children are immature before adulthood, so they need guardians and education and management from the state and schools. Then, from this perspective, the premise of child-oriented education in loose education is based on the immature thinking mode of children, so the future direction may be biased. The growth direction of children is centered on self-development, without the guidance of mature views and methods, and finally the setbacks will be doubled.
For example, many only children in China have always played a central role in their family roles. With the connivance of parents and the elderly, relaxed education has not been correctly guided in some basic social rules and ways of dealing with people, which eventually led to more social problems, such as the self-centered consciousness of the only child, schizophrenia, poor ability to adapt to the social environment, loneliness and lack of general security in the social environment.
For another example, calvert became a genius under his father's strict education.
Examples of theft, running away from home and accidental death of left-behind children in society are more the result of loose education (there is no education at all) (you can deduct this lavatory, you know ~).
For another example, some children in North American countries are educated. Although parents and schools encourage children to have their own ideas and support their hobbies, they are very careful to guide and correct their behaviors and habits step by step in the process of education. This is not loose education, not stocking. This is just an example of proper and strict education. If we carefully study American education, American primary school students are required to read 60 books every year, American children are required to have extracurricular activities or volunteer sales at every stage, and American children are encouraged to have independent sex education at an early stage, with appropriate failure punishment and so on. These are all examples of successful and severe education. (Education in China is not strict education, but corporal punishment. )
There are many more. By the way, you can search for the benefits of strict education.
If you argue that "strict education is better than liberal education", you only need to argue which one is better. Even in the end, strict education is not necessarily the best, but at least it is better than loose education.
Look for more examples. There are many pitfalls in this debate. In order to prevent the other party from stealing the concept, you must first establish your own stable concept. As long as a good concept is determined, there are actually many examples. Discuss with friends more ~
Bless you ~