First, slave education makes children lose their individuality.
Examination-oriented education is to completely teach the same set of concepts and basic theories to students, while ignoring individual differences. Understand that everyone is different. Not everyone likes math and physics, and not everyone likes ancient Chinese. What's the difference between the same standard and mass production of equipment? The core is that the method of score theory usually makes some children who fail in exams lose self-confidence, their hobbies are not recognized by social development, and then they turn around and learn the exam experience again, but what about the result? The actual effect is not as good as expected, and its own personalization is also lacking.
Second, too much emphasis on scores, ignoring other aspects of ability.
The characteristic of exam-oriented education is that it pays too much attention to the shaping of "intelligence", but ignores the fact that "morality", "physique", "beauty" and "labor" sometimes appear some "cramming education" situations in social development, which shows that people with high scores may not have strong abilities. Since education should be based on scores, many of them are not real heroes. Is there a problem with this choice? I have to admit that the disadvantages of paying too much attention to exam results are immeasurable. Sometimes it is found that some students do nothing but take exams after graduation.
Third, it is not conducive to children's physical and mental health.
Since children are the flowers of the motherland and the future of the Chinese nation, the physical and mental health of children is the goal of the reserve. Many doctors and experts have established how much sleep a child should have, but it is impossible for college students who take part in exam-oriented education. Moreover, the study found that many high school students sleep less than 5 hours a day on average. When asked what they are doing, many people often stay up late to study and train.
Fourth, if you can't learn real knowledge, you will easily get tired of learning.
The goal of education is nothing more than better talents, and excellent talents are usually people with "freedom of thought and independence of life". People who are forced to study will continue to have free thoughts. Anyway, I don't believe it. Even if someone wants to study hard and train, can exam-oriented education really bring the results he needs? In my opinion, these outstanding people are usually not the biggest contributors who can successfully pass the score test. People who really have ideas and lives are not all obtained by exam-oriented education and high marks. But rely on their own continuous learning and understanding in various fields. Instilling education is really easy to get bored.