Let me specifically introduce how to demonstrate as an opponent: exam-oriented education can't achieve the future.
First, from the characteristics of exam-oriented education, the main goal is to cope with the entrance examination. The main means are to pay attention to the teaching of "hardware" and the repeated teaching of the contents to be tested, to find a way out from squeezing time and expanding "exercise", to inculcate repeatedly, to determine the quality according to the examination results, and to reward "quality". According to the implementation of this management method and teaching system, although students are very bitter, the enrollment rate may temporarily rise. This short-term teaching behavior is fed back to society, parents and students, which strengthens this management mode and teaching system. As a result, many schools walk along this slope with peace of mind, forming a vicious circle. The ultimate goal (copying the following brother) is the enrollment rate. Different goals, different roads. As the saying goes, all roads lead to Rome, but how can different destinations have the same result? Don't tell me that one goes left and the other goes right. Two parallel lines will intersect one day (love dialogue should be known to many people).
2) From the bad consequences of exam-oriented education (or the information of the brothers upstairs): choose a few casually and remember to arrange the time.
Consequence 2: the educational thought of "lack of legs" has been created.
It is natural to get high marks in the exam, but the education for high marks under the exam-oriented education has become a reality. Students' moral character, self-cultivation, survival ability and self-reliance ability, which are related to children's life, have been neglected, and the educational thought of "missing legs" will inevitably create "missing legs" children.
Consequence five: created a "student score first" abnormal parents.
Parents are anxious about exam-oriented education, and their children's academic performance has become the top priority of the family, and it should also be included in the family's important economic expenditure plan. Students get good grades, everyone is happy, students get bad grades, punching and kicking, domestic violence is closely related to exam-oriented education, and even becomes the fuse of domestic violence.
Consequence 6: A lazy and greedy education manager is created, and the school work and teachers' level are evaluated by the students' achievements.
Consequence 7: A grassroots educator who is physically and mentally exhausted has been created.
The most bitter thing about exam-oriented education is the current grassroots educators. Students should get good grades. Without good students, it's no use talking. On the one hand, the enrollment war is intensifying, and even they try their best to "buy" excellent students and "dig" candidates. On the other hand, ordinary non-key schools are fighting fatigue. Teachers work at full capacity during the day and work overtime at night. There are no weekends, fewer holidays, more illness, and a lover who is not a teacher at home is tired.
Consequence 8: A deformed student group has been created.
We have to admit that exam-oriented education has trained some elite students, but most of them have been squeezed into the water on this wooden bridge. In fact, this is normal, but sadly, people who fall into the water have never learned to swim, so they have to learn again in the water, wasting themselves, consuming their families and slowing down their personal development. Even those students who crossed the single-plank bridge, some of them were psychologically deformed in the process of squeezing the single-plank bridge, which laid a curse for their future development.
Consequence 9: A psychopathic teacher was created.
The most serious harm to teachers caused by exam-oriented education is psychology. It is said that "points are the lifeblood of students", and now "points are also the lifeblood of teachers". In some places, it is clearly stipulated that whoever has a low average score will be laid off. As a result, teachers became psychopathic before they survived, and did a lot of things that violated teachers' normal psychology, such as telling students to carry forward the "Lei Feng spirit" during exams, and some even tried their best to steal questions and drive away students who did not study well (even using corporal punishment and other "punishments" for bad students). Isn't this a teacher's psychopathy?
Consequence 10: It has caused a bad manpower pattern of shortage of skilled talents and surplus of theoretical talents in China.
Consequence 1 1: It caused worldwide discrimination against China students.
Consequence 12: The myopia rate of China students is very high.
Are the students handed over by exam-oriented education really good students?
3) Suggestion: As a team leader, it is mainly to unite teammates into a whole, so everyone has a focus in the debate, which requires you to be prepared to lead your own views during the debate.
Question:
Q: The other party may ask: Since you say that exam-oriented education is not good, come up with a good plan ~
A: I have always felt that Japan is terrible, but can we propose a solution now? Reform is not a revolution, but a step-by-step process, not a hair-trigger event.
Q: Can you deny that China's exam-oriented education has not trained talents?
Has anyone won the Nobel Prize in China? ! ! They are called some China people. Can you say that this has nothing to do with exam-oriented education?
The other party asked: Since the other party has been saying that exam-oriented education is good, what happened to quality education?
I hope you will succeed in thinking of these for the time being.
You can leave me a message if you have any questions, and then join the group.