Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational Knowledge - If you are replaced, you can ask for reinstatement! Shandong University of Technology, does Chen Canchunxiu go to school?
If you are replaced, you can ask for reinstatement! Shandong University of Technology, does Chen Canchunxiu go to school?
The National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) voted to stop amending the education law, and the resolution to amend the education law will be implemented on April 30th, 20021. Perfecting the legal obligation of school tutoring is one of the key points in the revision of education law. One of the most important points is that people whose rights and interests have been damaged by the change of admission qualifications can request the restoration of admission qualifications. When Kangkang saw this news, he immediately thought of a person, a rural woman who regarded "going to college" as a lifelong resentment: Chen Chunxiu. Her experience and the chain reaction after being reported have greatly aroused the concern of the whole society about the phenomenon of "cramming for the Buddha's feet at the university", and also attracted the attention of the legal profession to the institutional defects in this area, which indirectly promoted the above-mentioned legal progress.

Who is Chen Chunxiu? Chen Chunxiu, a 37-year-old native of guanxian, Liaocheng, Shandong Province, is the mother of two children. Many people are familiar with the fact that she was forcibly crammed into the university. According to the disposal logic of common social hot issues, this matter should be said to be handled in place. The education of the replacement was invalid, and the post of the street office was removed and became a criminal suspect. It should be said that he paid the price for his past behavior; A series of public officials' respective obligations in the incident chain have been thoroughly investigated, and they have also been punished by party discipline and political discipline, and several of them are also suspected of breaking the law and making meritorious deeds. But the only thing that is not conducive to handling is that although she used to be the mother of two children and stayed at school for more than ten years, her family was under great economic pressure, but Chen Chunxiu still wanted to go to school.

Regarding Chen Chunxiu's wish to repeat the study, Shandong University of Technology responded that there is no such precedent. Kangkang sees this resolution this way: in the eyes of the public, such a reply makes people angry. This seemingly inhuman resolution caused considerable resentment in the social speech at that time: thousands of netizens poured into the school official micro, and all kinds of duplicity; Many Internet giants and media organizations have expressed doubts about this resolution. In the case of Chen Chunxiu's "stolen sixteen years", Shandong University of Technology is undoubtedly obligated.

This is not a problem of one or two people, but a systematic defect in the university enrollment and management system. Since it is a system problem, it is necessary to stop revising the system, which is also one of the purposes of this revision of the education law. Ten years ago, it was not as easy to get into college as it is today. In a poor rural family, parents can support their daughter to finish high school and take the college entrance examination in this way, and they have tried their best. The reason why she decided to enroll in a junior college at that time was that she didn't repeat after "failing the exam". In fact, it is because her family is poor that she will not drop out of school with a little economic talent. After failing in the college entrance examination for more than ten years, Chen Chunxiu rekindled his ambition to study. While taking care of two children, he works to support his family, and at the same time, he studies for the adult self-study exam. This story of "poor peasant women obsessed with learning" should be regarded as a positive energy model worthy of good publicity, even if they have not found themselves replaced by schools.

Chen Chunxiu said in an interview that he still wants to go back to Shanda Institute of Technology to study. That's because people let bygones be bygones, which provides the school with an opportunity to make up for the mistakes of that year. But as a result, the school's response was "there is no such precedent". In the eyes of the public, this attitude almost writes indifference and arrogance on the forehead. The person who said this must still feel that he is the top of charity. Just find an excuse to send her away. Because your work was neglected, you ruined people's lives and left their families in poverty. Now you refuse to pay for my mistake? This attitude is certainly intolerable to the public. Under the fierce criticism of all parties, the school quickly changed its mind and said, "We will actively coordinate and try our best to help them fulfill their wishes." But this kind of rhetoric is only used to deal with the negative public opinion of Taiji Chuan. This incident ended in nothing. Chen Chunxiu failed to be admitted to Shanda and failed to complete her "college dream".

This is actually another way to "bully honest people"; If Chen Chunxiu knew a little about self-hype, like another "defender" Gou Jing who came out behind her, she dared to come in and ask for traffic and attention, and the result would not be like this. At that time, Kangkang talked about Chen Chunxiu with a friend who worked in a university. He looked at it this way: in Chen Chunxiu's case, the public saw the instinctive indignation that education fairness was damaged; But her request is reasonable, but it is not so simple to complete.

From the perspective of being a meticulous person, this matter is full of pits: if Chen Chunxiu is allowed to come to school, but she didn't apply for Shanda Institute of Technology when she took the adult self-study exam, what name would you use to recruit her? Mountain Institute of Technology has long since stopped recruiting junior college students, and her major in international trade, which she was admitted to 0/6 years ago, once ceased to exist. Is it illegal for you to let her go directly to the undergraduate course? Which major should she go to? The current college entrance examination rules are extremely strict, and the school itself cannot apply for her student status. The need to reconcile with several superior departments means cross-departmental reconciliation and wrangling. The more substantial problem is that there is no basis and precedent for the victims who were displaced more than ten years ago to go to school again, and the superiors will face such a plea. This matter is very difficult to operate in practice, and it is not as simple as adding a name to the admission list as students think.

A year ago, the school said that Chen Chunxiu's desire to go back to school was "unprecedented". No matter what the public says, the rules are barely reasonable; Today, however, the education law has been revised, which once gave the victims who were crammed into universities the right to return to campus. As one of the obligors of the original, should Shantai Technology and relevant local departments take action? At the beginning, your school promised to help others reconcile. What is the result of reconciliation? Shouldn't it be an explanation to the parties and the public concerned about this matter? Can the local news media in Shandong also do an interview to see the changes of this family after one year and ask the parties' wishes?

The revision of this education law has made up for the defects of the previous rules and taken care of the public's concerns in time, which deserves our praise; However, the rights and interests expressly stipulated in the new law should not only be expressed in law, but also fall on real and detailed matters and the parties who enjoy such rights and interests. Only in this way can the public feel that the fairness and justice we expect can be gradually completed through the progress of social rule of law.