The other track is aimed at the children of ordinary people, who can only get employment or receive vocational education in primary and secondary schools after graduation from primary school. Moreover, in the same stage of education, these two tracks are completely independent, not only with different curriculum and teachers, but also with different training objectives.
Later, with the real emergence of the national education right, the state obtained the power to manage education from the church, especially with the further development of capitalist industry and commerce and the growing voice of people demanding the right to education, which made the two tracks in the two-track academic system gradually cross and converge.
Therefore, in the current dual-track school system in European countries such as Britain, France and Germany, it is no longer the original school system. However, in some stages of education and the setting of educational content, we can still see the traces of the dual-track system.
Professor Peking University tells the truth: the dual-track education system has become a "bottomless pit" for countless family investments.
Although the Ministry of Education has put forward a policy to reduce students' burden in view of the excessive pressure, with the aim of reducing students' pressure and returning to a happy childhood, it is obviously whimsical. After studying at school, students will be arranged by their parents to study in various cram schools, so that the pressure on students will not be alleviated, but will increase.
Is it okay not to go to cram school? Of course, the answer is yes, but it is not as worrying as the future development of students. A teacher of Peking University once pointed out that the dual-track education system has become a bottomless pit for countless family resources, which shows the disadvantages of current education.