It is reported that in 20 14, the music school applied to Guilin Education Bureau to change its business scope, increase the number of students enrolled and cancel the age limit. Guilin Education Bureau also passed this application at that time and stamped its official seal. Later, he went back on his word and refused to recognize the enrollment scope of the school, and twice included Hejun Music and Art Training School in the rectification list. The person in charge of the school believes that this has seriously affected the normal development of the school. Repeated feedback to Guilin Education Bureau failed, so they had to protect their legitimate rights and interests through legal means, and Guilin Education Bureau also lifted the restrictions on schools. I have to say that the Guilin Education Bureau has gone too far. The application signed by Guilin Education Bureau turned around and refused to recognize it. I also took this opportunity to put the school on the rectification list. This may be because this research is private. Private schools do not have a series of rights and interests of public schools.
There is no need to speculate too much on this matter. There are indeed many imperfections in private schools that need supervision, but this blatant intentional existence is absolutely not allowed by law. The way the person in charge of this school handles it also sets a good example for us. When we encounter problems that cannot be solved by repeated feedback, we can take up legal weapons to safeguard our rights and interests. The law will protect the rights and interests of every citizen, and the law will give us a satisfactory answer to our reasonable demands.
What else would you think? Welcome to leave a message in the comments section.