Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Case analysis of education law, seeking expert answers
Case analysis of education law, seeking expert answers
In case one, the school is not responsible, because the school is only responsible for the mistakes and faults in its educational and cultural activities. Wang's truancy and the psychological consultation fee caused by truancy are entirely caused by his own reasons. The so-called psychological consultation fee is not caused by the school's truancy of Wang. Children's obsession with games has a great influence on family environment, early childhood education, parents' attitude and social environment. It is unfair to ask the school for compensation according to the principle of fairness.

The way to deal with it is mainly appeasement, and teachers should bear the administrative responsibility of dereliction of duty, such as warning, demerit recording, withholding bonuses, etc.

Case 2, an accident happened in the school, and the school failed to pay attention to environmental safety.

It's hard to handle. The school is so bad that the buildings are leaking. It is impossible to have enough money to compensate teachers and children. Even if compensation is paid, the expenses incurred by the school will only lead to the failure of the classroom for a longer period of time. You can ask the education department of the local county government to pay attention to it, post for help, and ask the love fund for help.