I think the industrialization of education is to regard education as an industry and operate it in the mode of market economy. However, at present, the state has not adopted the policy of restructuring and marketization for public schools. The state seems to have adopted the education method of walking on two legs. One leg is the way to continue to take the state-run road. The other leg is to open the way for private enterprises. In recent years, many private schools have appeared in society. What kind of aristocratic schools, boarding schools and so on all belong to this type. Such schools do not have financial subsidies, but engage in teaching activities according to the laws of the market, so the fees are high. But they can't go their own way, such as the choice of school site, the allocation of teachers, the formulation of courses, the certification of academic qualifications and so on. And it must be approved by the competent department of the state. At present, the two legs of state-owned and private enterprises are one long and one short. Perhaps this private form is the embryonic form of industrialization. As for whether the socialization of logistics and the transfer of achievements in public universities belong to the category of industrialization, I can't say clearly. However, it seems impossible for government-run schools to take the road of marketization at present, because it is difficult and expensive to go to school at present, which is also a big social problem. School fees have become a persistent problem, and society even compares teachers to "cobras". Education should develop with popularization, and free education should be popularized in rural areas. The rapid transformation of industrialization can only intensify social contradictions and increase social unrest. You can find the national policy on education industrialization on relevant websites, but I haven't seen it yet. The above is only a personal opinion for discussion.