Many places began to implement the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" in primary and secondary schools, and the teacher industry lost its "establishment guarantee" from then on, which brought great influence to the teacher industry. Specifically, the impact of the implementation of the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" includes three aspects: the withdrawal of poor teachers from the teaching profession can improve the overall quality of the teaching profession, bring teachers a sense of crisis and enhance the competitiveness of the teaching profession; Implementing the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" can optimize the resource allocation of teachers' profession and achieve the best educational effect. 1, "teacher withdrawal mechanism" allows teachers with poor ability to withdraw from the teaching profession and improve their overall quality. The most direct consequence of the implementation of the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" is that some people with poor ability and unable to adapt to the post of teacher quit the teaching profession. This will form a good state of teachers' professional survival of the fittest, thus effectively improving the overall quality of teachers. ..... When a team of capable and high-quality teachers is formed, students will get a better education, which is extremely beneficial to their future development and progress. 2. Teachers' professional competitiveness can be enhanced through the "teacher withdrawal mechanism". The purpose of implementing the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" is to eliminate people with poor ability and optimize the ability and quality of teachers' profession. ..... Such measures will have a far-reaching impact on teachers' profession and create a sense of crisis among teachers, thus promoting them to study hard and improve their ability. This is extremely beneficial to improve the competitiveness of the whole teacher profession. 3. Implementing the "teacher withdrawal mechanism" can optimize the resource allocation of teachers' profession and achieve better educational results. By implementing the "teacher withdrawal mechanism", relevant parties can take this opportunity to optimize the allocation of resources in the teaching profession, thus achieving better educational results. ..... Specifically, after the implementation of the "teacher withdrawal mechanism", teachers' occupation will be optimized, and the corresponding resources will be used more fully and reasonably, which will greatly improve the education level of the school and achieve better educational results, thus achieving a good state of better development of the entire education industry. Change the 6-3-3 academic system to 5-2-3 academic system, that is, change the primary school from grade 6 to grade 5, junior high school from grade 3 to grade 2, and keep grade 3 in senior high school. After this change, it only takes 10 years from primary school to university, which is two years shorter than the original. Some people even continue to suggest that the academic system of undergraduate colleges and graduate students should be reduced, up to four or five years.
In the past, it took at least 16 years for an undergraduate to enter the society. He started school at the age of seven and graduated at least at the age of 23. After changing the academic system, an undergraduate who goes to school normally (without skipping a grade) is only 19 years old when he enters the society.
Many people think that the reform of the education system is very good. After all, they can come out to work three or four years earlier, and their social experience and capital accumulation will be much more. Lao Huang doesn't think this reform is bad, but everything has two sides. There must be positive effects, and negative effects can't escape. The key is whether the good side is magnified or the bad side is magnified after the real implementation. If the bad side is more obvious, it will properly become a modern version of "pulling out the seedlings to encourage them."
The two-year junior high school system did not appear in my impression. There is nothing unusual about the five-year primary school system. Lao Huang graduated from a five-year primary school. If the law of students' growth was taken as the standard and the five-year system was more reasonable, it would not have been changed to the sixth grade at the beginning. After all, in just 30 years, the growth law of human cubs has not changed qualitatively. Therefore, if the fifth grade is really restored and the ten-year education is realized, it is definitely not considered from the law of student growth.
Lao Huang believes that if the reform of shortening the academic system is implemented, it will certainly be an important measure to deal with the serious problems in China's aging society. In order to cope with the aging, the most direct thing people think of is delaying retirement. In fact, the country has been studying the possibility of delaying retirement. I believe everyone is unwilling to postpone retirement. After all, who doesn't want to enjoy it for a few more years? Under the current retirement system, when people reach retirement age, they are already old and don't have much time to enjoy. Lao Huang said that children and grandchildren enjoy much more retirement wages than the elderly. This is the so-called gnawing at the old. If we postpone retirement any longer, then our generations will really be fighting for our children and grandchildren.
So delaying retirement will inevitably encounter a lot of resistance. Since the old can't count on it, let's find a way to do it on the young. Shorten the academic system and let students enter social work earlier, while the retirement age remains the same. Isn't that a disguised form of delaying retirement for the laggards? Although Lao Huang said so, don't think that Lao Huang will object to it. After all, there are far more young people who want to enter the society early than those who accept delayed retirement. So when you think about it, it makes sense to shorten the academic system.
Those who support shortening the academic system also put forward a reason. They think that the sixth and ninth grade classes are basically reviewing, and the knowledge they have learned is finished before the fifth grade and the seventh and eighth grades. So there is no need to study such a long academic system, and it is reasonable to shorten the academic system.
In fact, Lao Huang is more qualified to talk about his own views in this regard. Because Lao Huang has taught math in the sixth grade, and math and chemistry in the ninth grade. Needless to say, chemistry was not taught until the ninth grade. Of course, we can bring chemistry to the eighth grade. As for math in grade six or nine, there is still something new to teach. Especially in the ninth grade, it is very important for students to learn quadratic equation, quadratic function, the foundation of circle, preliminary probability, inverse proportional function, similar triangles and acute trigonometric function. Think about it, including other subjects, if all these are compressed into grade seven and grade eight, can students really eat it?
Of course, some students can cope with it easily, but most students can't accept it. Therefore, it is inevitable to shorten the academic system and engage in elite education. Those students with good qualifications will reduce the academic system according to the current teaching content. Those students with average academic qualifications will inevitably need to cut the teaching content while compressing the academic system. Then, students who receive elite education will be admitted to undergraduate and postgraduate courses. Let students who receive "general education" go to technical secondary schools. This is in line with the teaching law, but it violates the educational fairness. Therefore, the educational reform of shortening the academic system is generally not optimistic.
So, how to solve the problem of aging without shortening the academic system, delaying retirement and encountering many obstacles? Lao Huang believes that aging is indeed a serious problem. But we seem to think in the wrong direction. The main problem of aging is the imminent loss of demographic dividend, not the lack of workers in society. To be precise, it should be the lack of consumers in society. Because with the rapid development of science and technology, mechanical automation and artificial intelligence, the demand of workers is actually not so great. What is really needed is consumers who have the ability to consume products produced by machines.
Therefore, shortening the academic system and entering the society in advance and delaying retirement have not really solved the core problem. What really needs to be solved is the birth rate and the distribution of social resources and labor products.