There is no doubt that many people have a fear in their minds. If they are not sure, higher education is not suitable for women's family life. A few people will deny that, in fact, higher education may make women refuse to restrain their activities within the scope of family responsibilities that are currently considered restrictive. Thinking women and women who can train their thinking are generally unwilling to limit their lives to ordering food, writing records, arranging flowers, or even smaller things. They will only help her mother with these important tasks.

Unfortunately, when it comes to anything of this type, people usually try their best to oppose it and condemn girls for not receiving too much education in family life; However, this cognition is hard to be overturned, because in many people's eyes, family life is composed of writing records and arranging flowers. There is no doubt that higher education is not needed to complete these duties. At present, everyone agrees that because of our population, a large number of women must remain single, and many of them make their own living. For them, they have facilities to some extent, which can cultivate their independence. If the number of women is small, classroom education will not be in short supply. If so, women's higher education will only involve a small part, and these women will be independent of the scope of gender considerations, and they will have little effect on improving the overall education level of women.

2. If we are forced to come to a conclusion that higher education is suitable for specific women who live independently, but not necessarily for family life, we must abide by the fact that the benefits that higher education brings to women are less than what the public hopes. Its founders don't want to simply create a small group of women with higher education, they are only suitable for some special tasks; They hope to improve women's educational level as a whole, and by doing so, increase women's role in society and their remuneration. It must always be a minority of women, just like a few men go to college; But a few set standards for the rest, not only because of its influence on early learning courses, but also because it provides something called "intelligent value-added environmental media" and points out opportunities for those people or ways for those people's intelligence to learn as advanced as possible. If these minorities have proper influence, they must come from all walks of life and penetrate into all aspects of life. Women with higher education should not only be suitable to be middle school teachers, guardians of the poor, doctors and members of education authorities, but also be suitable to be wives, mothers, sisters, nurses who take care of patients, useful daughters in families and even comfortable ladies in religious communities.

Is there any reason to expect that higher education is not suitable for her duties? Sometimes, higher education seems to take on all the responsibilities of young women. Modern women, or some people prefer to call her new women, are expected to be highly educated women. I have never defined "new women", but as a general rule, I think we can assume that new women are women who have done what the speaker said women should not do. However, maybe she is an unpleasant person at ordinary times. If so, I think I might add some people with little education to this definition. Girls who speak loudly, make their own decisions, read the latest novels, locate the latest scripts, smoke and speak slang are often not college girls. There is no doubt that she earned her income through independence. She proved that women can share more work in society. Sometimes, alas, her gratitude to those who never stop working and rarely fight hatred has won them independence, which will be proved by her actions. Anyway, many women don't know how to use independence.