If students only know concepts and theories in the process of education, but don't know where they come from and for whom, it is the transmission of knowledge, not the spread of education. Just like today's artificial intelligence technology, before machine learning, machines are transmitted into data, which is the way of thinking of machines, but modern education tries to turn every student into a machine. For example, in China's textbooks, most definitions and concepts come first, and examples and applications come last. But don't these conceptual theories come from previous experiments or practices? This exploration process is lost in modern education. No one can sum up the law before studying it. If there is, it is not education but theology. Objectively speaking, China's textbooks are comprehensive and rich in content, and many concepts are explained by concise sentences, but this is only from the perspective of learning. From the beginner's point of view, it is useless to summarize a broad and complicated concept with very refined sentences. The textbooks in our country belong to extracurricular reading, which is suitable for learners to check and fill in the gaps. However, as a teaching material, there are still some shortcomings. But why does China always adopt this criticized way of education?
This is related to China itself. As a country with a population of 654.38+0.4 billion, China has a high density of population and a large number of students. Considering the cost of education, teaching a course is limited and teachers' resources are limited. Therefore, large-scale education in China is the most representative one, with 50 or even 70 students in a class. To achieve the goal of education, we must ignore individual consciousness, take the group as the center, choose the most suitable education method for most students and ensure the cost. At the same time, this method needs to improve the level of a group of students at the same time. This is cramming education, one of them.
When selecting talents in China, the selection type is not the selection type. It is to select a group of middle-level students from a large number of students, not a few excellent students from a small group. But it will erase individual consciousness. A gifted student will fade away without any outside help until he disappears. The college entrance examination is like processing canned food. Many students lined up to rush forward. After being filled with boring and incomprehensible knowledge, they are sent to different levels of factories (schools) for reprocessing. Needless to say, it is still filling processing, and finally they are transported to the society. This is a kind of "talent" praised by people. In contrast, is the reduction of talent standards a self-caused or inevitable?