I think they really expounded a sentence, making money wisely, seizing opportunities, taking advantage of the shortcomings of rural education and then establishing cram schools to earn tuition fees and reduce the burden on families. But when the forest is big, there are all kinds of birds. Some people obviously have no ability to teach, but they want to mislead others for this money. I can't stand it.

Because I am also a college student, my family asked me to go to cram school when I came back, but I didn't, because I knew that I couldn't teach my children anything by myself, wasting their time and collecting their money would upset my conscience. And when I came back, some students who came back early had already started cram schools, so it was impossible to rob students from them.

Again, I want to say a few words. In fact, for those who come back early, I think the cram school you run is still useful if it is aimed at a few students, but more than 20 or 30 students are recruited at once, and the fees are not low. Won't it hurt your conscience to hold such money in your hand? I feel that for some teachers, they can't teach twenty or thirty students in just 30 days, so when my mother asked me if I wanted my sister to go to cram school, I refused, because I thought it would be a waste of money even if I went. What can he teach so many people? What he teaches simply doesn't deserve so much money. Don't say that he went to that school. It's no use. They are all college students and have no teaching experience. Who will be worse than who? Don't use your school as a cover.

So if a college student who runs a cram school reads my comments, I hope you will think about it. Do you want to teach or make money? If you want to teach, I hope you can raise the fees and then target a few students instead of dozens. If you want to make money, don't delay those students. They can pay higher prices and learn more, but you are just delaying them.