Improving the cultural quality of the Chinese nation is the wish of every Chinese descendant. The state also attaches great importance to improving the cultural quality of the Chinese nation and has implemented the policy of nine-year compulsory education. But has the nine-year compulsory education promoted by the state improved the cultural quality of our Chinese nation? This should be analyzed from the advantages and disadvantages of nine-year compulsory education. First, implement nine-year compulsory education. Many students have books to read and can all graduate from junior high school, so the lowest education in the motherland is junior high school. On the surface, this has greatly improved the cultural knowledge of our Chinese nation. But in fact? Under this system, our students are like a reassurance. I'm not afraid. I have no books to read. Anyway, I graduated from junior high school at the worst. Under this idea, many students have no pressure, no progress and nothing to do all day. Secondly, under the nine-year compulsory education, our teacher's words no longer have any prestige. Nowadays, students have a high IQ and a certain understanding of social knowledge. They are well aware of the "benefits" of implementing nine-year compulsory education in the country. Don't listen to the teacher, don't do your homework, and so on. Teachers can't help them, because they will graduate sooner or later. In this way, the teacher lost his prestige in front of some students. Thirdly, the implementation of nine-year compulsory education has caused many schools to cancel the repetition system. No matter how students study, this year is grade one and next year is grade two. In this way, students will be more indulgent and worry about not graduating. If there is a repeat reading system, students are under great pressure, afraid of repeating classes and giving people jokes, and they have to pay an extra year's tuition and spend money. Secondly, teachers' prestige for students has also improved. Teachers have the right to make students repeat grades and make poor students not listen to their teachers. As for nine-year compulsory education, I quite agree. For students, it is not whether the teacher has prestige, but whether the teacher has the skills and methods to manage students, whether he is fully committed, and how parents' attitudes and participation are in the process of educating their children. Children usually don't need to bother, especially in the early days, if teachers guide them properly, parents have strong educational awareness and great participation. As for the abolition of the repeat reading system, I personally disapprove of it, because when some children can't keep up with the team, they are given a rest time so that they can go forward better. This one-size-fits-all approach does not conform to the principle of individual differences in education. Although the education system has various drawbacks and rigid trends, its role cannot be ignored.