Explain the definition of rules and hidden rules as usual. In short, Ming rules are rules that can be written in plain text, agreed by most people (or representatives), made public, and in line with public expectations (my own understanding). What is the law of darkness? You can't talk about the bright side, but everyone who knows it knows it. Although it is not on the table, it can also play a great role. Of course, if not, who cares what the rules are, right? Of course, in addition to my own assumptions, I am still searching for definitions.

Rules generally refer to regulations and articles of association jointly formulated by the masses, approved or uniformly formulated and adopted by representatives, and abided by all members of the masses. It exists in three forms: explicit rules, hidden rules and meta-rules. No matter which rule violates good, evil and morality, it must be severely punished to maintain time harmony; Ming rules are clearly defined rules, which have limitations and need to be continuously improved; Unspoken rules are rules that have no explicit provisions and no established restrictions, which can make up for the shortcomings of explicit rules; Meta-rule is a rule to solve problems through violent competition, a mixture of good and evil, and an immoral and civilized way.

After reading this definition, there are still surprises. Its definition of rules is very simple and easy to understand, and there is basically no weight or omission. But my understanding is that meta-rules should not be juxtaposed with explicit rules and unspoken rules, but should be retired (I wanted to use the word retirement at first, but obviously there is no need to retire), which is the best backing for its smooth progress. It is also mentioned in this definition that hidden rules can make up for the deficiency of explicit rules, which is still very helpful. I feel that there are still human feelings in places not covered by the law. For example, the word "as appropriate". Sometimes it's good. Well, sometimes. Today's theme is the bright rules in front of the hidden rules, or the bright rules written in front of the hidden rules. That is to say, in the same environment and the same event, the Ming rules have provisions for it, and the hidden rules also have constraints on it. Which one should I follow? Give a few examples to better illustrate. As discussed before, if your family breaks the law and hides in your place, do you want to help the police maintain justice? Do you want to hand over people, so as to put the so-called righteousness above family ties (I think this example is enough)? According to Article 310 of the Criminal Law: "Whoever knowingly provides a hiding place or property for a criminal, helps him escape or perjures, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance; If the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years (from search). If this illegal person is your parents or children, if you do not actively cooperate with the police, but deliberately conceal it, then according to the Ming rules, this is a crime. If you cooperate with the police to hand over your next of kin to the police, you will be convicted and sentenced today. What is this? This is the righteousness above family loyalty? That's very nice. This is the artificial separation of family ties. I think this rule is a bit of a test of human nature. Of course, the most unbearable test is human nature. What should people do when this explicit rule and implicit rule contradict each other? I still consider interest and love. Whoever has the upper hand will take corresponding action. At that time, let's look at interest and love. Which one will we choose? As people who eat melons, we just need to look forward to it. In other words, we don't need to look forward to the word, just eat melons, and the result will come naturally. Then talk for a few days after dinner, and it will fade. But what about customers? Just like an exam, I remember that when I was at school, the teacher made a spot check. Before the roll call, everyone was nervous and afraid of being called. But once the roll call was not made by ourselves, everyone was relieved except the "unlucky" who was called up. Do you miss the story of butchers killing pigs? I think the meaning is similar. Of course, this is not the relationship between oppression and resistance, but there are similarities and differences. Just judging from whether it is just an example of putting righteousness above family members or shielding crimes, I think this law does not consider it from the perspective of the people, or excludes the family members of suspects from the word "people". Article 3 10 of the criminal law is at the expense of one person's interests, for the benefit of most people. Some people say that this will cultivate personal indifference, but I don't think so. After all, this situation is rare. In most cases, the family still loves each other, right?

Do the explicit rules in front of the hidden rules have any effect? Yes, what's the use of that? Will it become "full of benevolence and morality, full of thieves and prostitutes" written in Han Feizi's Difficulties? Clear rules, some people abide by them, hidden rules, some people abide by them. These two people are likely to overlap and exchange, and observing in the flow of time and space may not be a fixed choice. In other words, in this case, I choose to abide by the Ming rules and abandon the hidden rules; In another environment, I would follow the unspoken rules and give up the explicit rules. Why? Because you want to achieve your goal. Either way, it is an appropriate way to achieve the goal. So, sometimes we choose to use hidden rules. This unspeakable order is not necessary. I believe that we can only choose it because it is more efficient. Simply disprove, if the explicit rules were more efficient, no one would choose the unspoken rules. Only in this case, that is, under the constraints of Ming rules, can we succeed, but the efficiency is much lower than that under hidden rules, and some people will choose the latter (I don't have to take risks here, because not all hidden rules are risky). I also remembered a passage in a junior high school textbook that described capitalists in Das Kapital. "If there is a profit of 10%, it is guaranteed to be used everywhere; With a profit of 20%, it will be active; With a profit of 50%, you will take risks; Profit 100%, dare to trample on all human laws; With a profit of 300%, it dares to commit any crime, even if it is the danger of hanging its head. " The temptation of interest is summed up so simply and profoundly. I have been recording whether 100% and 300% are opposite, but this does not affect its own meaning. I still remember that in the book "Thieves' Nest", some interesting things about American Wall Street finance in the 1980s were recorded. No matter what the real situation is, it truly and clearly describes the infinite charm of money to people, and people will give their lives for it under any circumstances. The ending of the story is realistic. Those who made a lot of money are still making a lot of money, and their lives and practices have not been fundamentally affected by legal sanctions. I don't know whether the author has a big brain hole or has experienced it personally. However, judging from the reader's god, I tend to open my mind wide. After all, there are too many details to be a person, and even if all the parties are put together, they may not be able to repeat them completely. I still remember an example where someone in the family was sick and needed an operation. The doctor clearly told you that you need 1 000 yuan, which is for foreign experts and must be in cash. Needless to say, no matter what the money is for, it supports cash, and the payee doesn't have any receipts or invoices. It seems that there is nothing left but memories. If you forget, you forget. There is no evidence. This is also a typical hidden rule. As an unfavorable party, the health of my family is in the hands of doctors, and there is no room for resistance. No, it's not that there is no room for resistance. I just didn't have the courage to resist at that time. To put it bluntly, it's still fear, fear of unknown origin.

To sum up, when there is a contradiction between the explicit rules and the implicit rules, for a person, he will choose the one that is most beneficial to him. This advantage may be economic interests, conscience condemnation, or love. If many people can't agree on whether to use explicit rules or implicit rules, then it may be time for meta-rules to appear. Metarule is a weapon, which does not distinguish between good and evil, but can bring different results of good and evil. Of course, due to different positions, the understanding of good and evil is also somewhat different. It can be said that in any case, once the meta-rule is used, there will always be losers. Ming rules should advocate fairness and justice, and hidden rules should correspond to them. What they advocate should be that they don't care about fairness, as long as they are on the unfair side. In the struggle of using meta-rules, if the party who advocates explicit rules wins, it will be very uncomfortable for the party who advocates hidden rules to lose their interests; On the contrary, if the party who advocates hidden rules wins, then the party who advocates clear rules will be very uncomfortable if its interests are damaged. There is another interesting situation. From the perspective of human history, in the hidden rules, the favorable party is defending its own interests, and the unfavorable party is also defending its own interests. This conflict has never stopped. Sometimes the role will change, and sometimes even the role will not change. What are you busy with? What are you happy about? If there is such a person, he has had a very important influence on human history, but he has not left a name or is not widely known. What about such a person? For what? Did you do what you like, just for self-realization? I am also thinking about such an example. For example, we touch the Internet almost every day, but most people don't know who invented it. I just found out that he confiscated the patent fee. But we know who Jobs is, haha. By the way, some people used to say that when they proved that their second place would not be remembered, you knew that the first peak was Mount Everest. What about the second peak? Most people don't know it's the Jogory Peak in Pamirs. I looked it up and wrote it down, but I still don't know what the third peak is. Of course, some people will ask me, like Liu Xiang 2004 Olympic Games 1 10 hurdles, who is the runner-up? Well, you don't know, and I don't know, but the people in the country where the athlete lives will not forget his contribution. We will only remember milestone events and tasks. Let's give another example of a character. These people were all romantic figures at that time. Can you name all the emperors in China? Ha ha ha ha.

After writing these words, I feel that no matter what kind of choice, it is ultimately determined by interest and love.