The correct answer to this question may be this: when students make mistakes, teachers should blindly educate and punish students or parents, which is the performance of teachers' inaction and inability to shirk their responsibilities.
To tell the truth, most teachers, especially junior high school teachers, deal with problems in this way: students make mistakes and directly inform their parents to take them home for education, and parents will come back after education, and teachers are not responsible for education. Teaching and educating people is a teacher's duty. Why do some teachers only teach and not educate people now? Lao Li's analysis has the following three reasons:
1. Teaching achievement accounts for a large proportion in teacher assessment, and most teachers pay more attention to teaching achievement. What kind of teacher is a good teacher? There is no quantitative standard. However, students' test scores are real data, and both principals and parents think that teachers with high class test scores are good teachers. Since everyone measures teachers' level by their teaching achievements, teachers certainly pay more attention to students' achievements. As for the little things that students make mistakes, teachers simply have no time and mood to take care of them.
The relationship between teachers and students is very subtle. When parents give their children to the teacher, they say to the teacher: Let go of the teacher, you beat and scold my children. However, when teachers really beat and scold students, parents will also beat and scold teachers. So this is the situation now. Many teachers don't want to take care of it, and they dare not. In particular, some children are very fragile inside. Criticize your child a few words, and if something happens to your child, your career will end early. In this case, for safety reasons, most teachers choose to give their students to their parents for education.
3. Some teachers have no ability to educate students. Teachers have studied pedagogy and psychology in college, but the first-line situation is very complicated. It is difficult for us to educate students directly with the knowledge in textbooks. Teachers who really educate students have rich experience in struggle and must keep pace with the times, because each student group has different characteristics. However, some teachers only pay attention to the teaching results and ignore the exercise and accumulation in this area, which is really helpless for the education of students. Sometimes a teacher suddenly wants to educate a student, but he is finally persuaded by the student. There are such teachers in reality. . . . . . .
The above is Lao Li's analysis of this problem. I hope you can read it clearly.