First, the knowledge structure of teachers
The main task of teachers is to "teach and educate people", and education is the process of cultivating talents for the future with known knowledge. Today, with the gradual informatization of knowledge, as a teacher, we should have knowledge of both the subjects we teach and pedagogy and psychology. "The accumulation of water is not thick, and the negative boat is weak." To be an excellent teacher, you must have profound academic foundation, rich cultural background and profound and unique educational ideas. Then, as a teacher, standing on the three-foot platform, are we knowledgeable? There is a good saying that if you want to give a person a glass of water, you must have a bucket of water, and this bucket of water is best to keep increasing. Indeed, as a teacher of a certain professional course, we can't doubt his professional quality, so can we ignore other qualities? Absolutely not. We also demand the quality of moral and aesthetic education teachers. Bloom, an American contemporary educator, said: Everyone can learn well. More than 95% of students' ability difference is only the difference of learning speed, not the difference of intelligence, so most students can master the subjects they teach. Therefore, teachers play an inestimable role in the immature stage of students' physiology and psychology. Therefore, to be a good teacher, we should not only pay attention to professional knowledge, but also pay attention to the relevant knowledge structure system, such as pedagogy, psychology, modern educational technology, computer operation and application, and have certain language expression ability, which requires Putonghua to pass the test. Tao Xingzhi said, "The teacher's duty is to teach thousands of things and teach people to seek truth." . The job of students is to "learn a lot and learn to be a real person". The teacher's task is very clear, so if we have knowledge as teachers, we will be saved by teaching students to seek truth and apply what we have learned. "It is better to teach people to fish than to teach them to fish", so as to achieve "it is too cold to learn from the heights".
Second, teachers' personal behavior.
Primary and secondary school students are in the immature and developing stage of physiology and psychology. If there is no good guiding direction, they will easily take detours and go astray in life. Therefore, teachers have a long way to go, and as students at this stage, they especially "trust" teachers and have strong imitation ability. Therefore, teachers should pay more attention to being a teacher by example. As a teacher, his words and deeds will have a great influence on students. For example, I encountered such a thing during my internship. A male teacher is teaching students "no smoking" to teach them to take care of themselves and others' health, while he openly smokes in the classroom in the self-study class that day. We can guess that the students talked about it after seeing it. By the same token, when we educate students to pay attention to social moral common sense such as public health and public order, should we also start from me and set an example? As a teacher, a people's teacher who "teaches and educates people", if you want to "teach and educate people" and if your theory is convincing on the podium, shouldn't you focus on small things, pay attention to personal behavior everywhere, be a real teacher and take responsibility by example, instead of students joking that "teachers are engineers of human souls and sanctimonious wolves in sheep's clothing." Although the students' comments are overdone, they are not meaningless. So I think, what's the use of being a knowledgeable teacher if the moral quality is not good and you can't be a teacher?
Third, be able to put yourself in the students' shoes.
As a teacher, being able to stand on the podium today is called a teacher, then he must have gone through yesterday's student days, and the change from student to teacher is just a change of identity. He also experienced the student days, so I think we should be able to understand and appreciate the students' thoughts and behaviors in this period and stage, so we should not feel incredible and strange about what the students have done, but should accept, tolerate and go with an understanding heart. Long live the understanding is still advocated, and the corporal punishment education mode of "the top scholar under the stick" should be put an end to. For example, Class 4, Grade 1, the class I took as an intern, used to have a look of excitement when the teacher was in class, while the students were all lifeless and didn't like to answer and think about questions. So the columnists put a lot of pressure on them, and once they entered the classroom, they were not interested. So director Yu began to implement the action plan: stand up and speak one by one, stand still and even make "personal attacks". Students who are timid and afraid to answer questions are scared out of their wits. How can they have the courage to answer questions? Even the head teacher didn't have the courage to say "a dead mouse feels cold" and stand up. I was also very important when I was a class teacher. I shouted a foul for the students at that time and felt that their class teacher should not "teach" the students so much. I think if it were me, I wouldn't stand the teacher comparing me to a "dead pig". In my class, I advocate democracy and freedom, give every student full freedom, and transfer the teacher's power of learning, answering and feedback to students, supplemented by spiritual encouragement and verbal praise, such as "Please stand up bravely, show yourself and fully show your' leadership' style". In this way, from English classes to Chinese classes and other subjects, students have the initiative and positive consciousness to answer questions. The same incident, different methods, has achieved unexpected results, which is not good. At the same time, it should be said that juvenile puppy love is correct. However, some teachers took coercive measures from the beginning, instead of persuasion and education and correct guidance, which caused very serious consequences. I think, as a teacher, it should be easy to understand some kind of rebellious psychology of students, so why let it come into being and promote its development? I think it is a lack of putting yourself in the students' shoes.
In a word, as a good teacher and excellent teacher, one should not only have noble moral character, excellent character, modesty and eagerness to learn, enthusiasm and cheerfulness, but also have the spirit of democracy, justice, patience, tolerance, humor, respect for others and good cooperation with others, so as to "win a heart" for teaching and educating people without spending a grass.