How to treat the difference between domestic education and foreign education? This is an outdated problem. The most discussed issue is the difference between China education and Japanese education. Personally, I think that each country has different national conditions and different education methods, so we should be tolerant.
1. Briefly talk about the difference between foreign education and domestic education. Take Japan as an example. As we all know, Japanese education is the best education in the world to cultivate children's independence and hard-working ability. This is obvious to all the world, but this kind of education can't be completely transferred at once, especially because of the different national conditions in China. I think it is a problem for children in China to cross the street with schoolbags on their backs and go to school by themselves.
2. Compare domestic education with American education. American education likes to cultivate children's creativity and thinks that every child is unique and is their future star. Therefore, it is particularly important to cultivate children's creativity in human rights. The children in China are spoiled at home, and they are all afraid that their children will lose at the starting line. They are versatile from kindergarten, and rarely let their children cultivate their nature and creativity. Only in this way will the reform take a long time.
According to the national conditions of our own country, the way of education is actually changing slowly, but no matter how it changes, it will take a long time. I really hope that the country will pay more and more attention to the training of talents in this area and cultivate a better team of teachers.
4. The purpose of education is different. Domestic education mainly depends on "enrollment rate". Judging from primary schools, junior high schools and senior high schools all over the country, the teaching purpose of almost all schools is to see how many students are admitted to key junior high schools, senior high schools or universities every year. The "enrollment rate" is even directly linked to teachers' income. Therefore, the school's pursuit of "enrollment rate" has become the only purpose. Taking Canadian middle schools as an example, foreign education mainly aims at cultivating "workers with certain skills and skills". As for the number of high school graduates admitted to universities every year, it has nothing to do with the teachers of the school. Teachers in schools all "eat public grain" and their salaries are paid by the government, so the benefits are not "flexible".
All the above are about the difference between domestic education and foreign education, and how we need to treat it correctly. I hope it helps you!