The second child was born naturally, because the boss was born by himself, and he didn't want to have a knife in his stomach, but he still planned to give birth by himself.
So is it different from a baby who was born with a belly plan?
Honestly, I'm not sure! I'm not a medical student, and I don't know anything about baby care. All the knowledge I have accumulated now is found out from the practice of taking care of my boss.
A natural birth, two children should not delay jaundice. When the boss was three years old, he had indigestion and got pneumonia. Cough, fever and respiratory infection are also uninterrupted. If you have a little cold, give your child some medicine quickly.
So what's the difference? I can't see!
I think there should be a difference. I can't see the potential difference, after all, it involves more professional medical knowledge; What I hear most about the difference in tooling is that children who give birth naturally will have stronger physical resistance than those who give birth by caesarean section after being squeezed by their mother's birth canal. Is that really the case?
I can't draw a conclusion, but my personal experience tells me that the physical resistance of children who have caesarean section is not necessarily worse than that of children who have a natural birth. My two babies are both delivered by caesarean section, breast-fed and in good health. I have a friend. Both children were born naturally and fed artificially. Especially the eldest one, whose physical quality was too low, went to the hospital in a couple of days.
This shows that the role of breast milk is still great, and the mode of production is not absolute. There are many factors that cannot be generalized.
There is not much obvious difference between most children, but some studies show that children born naturally have better immunity, stronger cardiopulmonary function and lower probability of respiratory diseases than children born by caesarean section.
A natural baby will be squeezed by the birth canal during the delivery of the mother, and the amniotic fluid sucked into the uterus will be discharged during the squeezing process. This can stimulate the production of surfactant in baby's lungs, which is beneficial to the development of baby's lungs. In addition, the baby will carry a part of the mother's flora when passing through the birth canal, which is also very beneficial to the baby's health. It seems that natural delivery is really beneficial to the baby, but not every pregnant mother can have a natural delivery, and some will only choose caesarean section for individual reasons.
In fact, you don't have to worry too much about the impact of caesarean section on your baby's health. As the saying goes, what is born is insufficient, and it can be supplemented the day after tomorrow.
In-laws said: "The way to have a natural birth is the best, and babies who have a natural birth are smarter, because many people who have a natural birth have no anesthesia and will not affect the growth of their brains."
Parenting just encountered the same problem during this period. A few years ago, the expected date of delivery of the child-rearing sister was coming, but she was also worried about one thing, whether to choose a natural delivery or a caesarean section. In-laws' opinion is to choose natural delivery mode, while the lover of little sister prefers caesarean section.
As a daughter-in-law, she never talks back to her in-laws. At the same time, she did hear the saying that "naturally born babies will be smarter".
Her lover said, "You are in poor health and afraid of pain. Will it be unbearable to open the uterus and tear the perineum? "
Most postpartum mothers want to have this kind of confusion. Should I choose a natural delivery or a caesarean section? Are naturally born babies really smarter? What's the difference between natural delivery and caesarean section?
Is the baby smarter in the way of natural delivery?
Many people think that babies who give birth naturally will be smarter, and the fundamental reasons are nothing more than two aspects.
Many people may say that pregnant mothers will use anesthetics when choosing caesarean section, and some components in anesthetics will enter the uterus by using the blood circulation system, which will affect the baby's brain development, leading many people to think that the baby who gives birth naturally will be smarter because it is not affected by anesthetics.
During natural childbirth, the baby's brain will be squeezed by the birth canal. Some people think that this kind of squeezing will accelerate the blood circulation in the baby's brain, thus affecting the cranial nerves and contributing to brain development to some extent.
In fact, most of the above views are unreasonable. When the baby is in labor, it is squeezed by the birth canal. This kind of squeezing does affect the blood circulation of many babies' brains, but it has little effect on brain development, and even has some adverse effects on brain volume and its sulcus.
According to scientific research, 30% of the baby's brain development comes from genetic inheritance, and 70% comes from the nutrition that the pregnant mother ingests during pregnancy, the nutrition acquired after tomorrow and the cultural education received. Either way, it can be explained that there is no strong relationship between the baby's IQ and the mode of delivery.
The emergence of caesarean section is to better cope with some dystocia, and it is a technical means that will only be chosen if it endangers the health and personal safety of mother and baby.
On the other hand, although anesthetics were used when choosing caesarean section, most of these anesthetics were semi-anesthetized, hitting the spine and having a certain distance from the baby in the abdomen. At the same time, the efficiency of caesarean section is fast, and the time from operation to taking out the baby is short, which basically does not have adverse effects on the baby's cranial nerves.
The difference between normal delivery and caesarean section.
A. Different immune abilities
B. Maturity of sensory system
The baby who has not been squeezed by cesarean section is born directly from the baby's mother's body and is not affected by the birth canal, so it is likely to cause some dysfunction of the baby.
abstract
Choose the most suitable delivery mode, don't trust the folk gossip mode easily, and give birth reasonably. Considering the actual situation, pregnancy is a common biological course for women, and most pregnant mothers can give birth naturally at the end of pregnancy.
There is no difference between children, but there are also differences.
Caesarean section was not invented to relieve women's pain and make delivery smoother.
Cesarean section is a necessary measure to make women give birth more safely.
For example, dystocia, such as fetal malposition, such as twins, was a narrow escape in ancient times, but it is no longer a problem after caesarean section.
However, when cesarean section is abused, it will have an impact on the quality of children and our next generation.
What are the bad aspects of cesarean section? Then you have to talk about the advantages of natural delivery.
The biggest benefit of vaginal delivery to the fetus is that the mother's birth canal keeps squeezing the fetus. The extrusion time can be as long as ten hours.
1 It can promote the heart and lung function of the fetus by squeezing, which makes his heart and lung function more mature after birth and less prone to some diseases.
Squeezing can stimulate its immune system and make it more resistant.
3 Squeeze and stimulate the cerebral cortex. Let the baby's future coordination ability and learning ability be stronger.
But these so-called benefits, as we told a person, you should exercise every day, after which you can strengthen your resistance and prolong your life.
Direct benefits are invisible and intangible. Or not so direct. So it has been ignored.
However, I have a neighbor who is a retired dean of academic affairs. He said that in his decades of teaching career, he felt that those children who were dissected were not as smart as those who gave birth naturally. I don't know if it counts as proof.
But there is no difference between a caesarean section child and a natural delivery child.
If there are sufficient reasons to perform caesarean section for the purpose of safety and rescue, then caesarean section is a very good technology, which saves the lives of mother and child. What difference can it make?
Come back and think about it. Children are born smart. Perhaps there is another factor. Because of this family, it is obviously more painful for this mother to choose a natural birth.
But the mother didn't choose the shortcut because of the pain, so he told the average person to have stronger perseverance, and the children educated by parents in this way will definitely be better.
On the contrary, those parents who have no reason to have a cesarean section instead of choosing a cesarean section, in order to avoid the pain of natural delivery. Might be better at avoiding it. Normal and fast. Instead of facing difficulties, facing difficulties. Will the children trained in this way also have an impact?
Here, it is not that the pain of natural birth is good.
Because. Development in recent decades. Painless delivery technology has been very mature, and labor pain, a painful thing for women, can be well alleviated, which has been slowly developed in most hospitals in China, and some hospitals even reach more than 90%.
Therefore, if there are still women who are worried about labor pain, please choose a hospital with labor analgesia for delivery, instead of looking for someone to find an acquaintance to choose a cesarean section with "unknown reasons".
I think the difference between natural delivery and caesarean section is more in the mother. For the baby, except for the initial period of time, there is not much difference in the later period.
Talk about the comparison between yourself and your pregnant friend in the same ward during childbirth.
We were due to give birth on the same day and were admitted to the hospital on the same day. Decided to give birth naturally at the beginning, and pregnant friends arranged for her to have a caesarean section for various reasons. The night I was in great pain, her baby didn't move, so she waited for the operation the next morning. I was so envious at that time that I really wanted to cut it, so that I wouldn't have to suffer such fragmentary pain.
It hurt all night, and I gave birth to a baby the next morning. After returning to the ward, I began to breastfeed. At that time, there was no milk, but the baby's mouth was still sucking strongly, and my tears were coming down.
My pregnant sister gave birth to her little prince by caesarean section three hours later than me, but after he came back, he slept for a long time without opening his eyes or looking for milk. When I woke up, I looked for milk to eat. My mother really didn't have the strength to feed him. Yue Yue gave him milk powder, which is said to be very powerful.
After giving birth, I went to the bathroom in the afternoon. I can also sit in the hospital bed and eat by myself, just bending over, because the lateral incision still hurts.
My pregnant sister didn't go to the fields until the third day after I was discharged from the hospital. Family members feed them before eating.
Later, my baby and the little prince were both strong and not very sick. The knife edge of my pregnant sister has been hurting for several years, and so has the knife edge cut here.
There must be a difference! I won't talk about professional knowledge. As long as the maternal body condition is good, willing to give birth, can give birth, then give birth by yourself. If the doctor recommends caesarean section, then cut it. Remember, going to the hospital is a big deal. Choose doctors you trust and trust them fully. Be kind, not always a giant baby.
Natural delivery is a natural mode of production. The baby's squeezing through the birth canal will help the development of the lungs and reduce the occurrence of pneumonia. Ma Bao's body will recover faster.
The first child was delivered naturally and the second child was delivered by caesarean section. There is no difference between resistance and intelligence.
My mother gave birth naturally, and so did my child.
What's the difference between natural delivery and caesarean section?
A natural delivery is a natural delivery. In the case of natural delivery, the fetal lung function is effectively exercised after being squeezed by the birth canal.
The mother who gave birth to the child naturally recovered quickly after delivery, and there was no scar on her stomach. However, in the process of natural delivery, because the fetal head is too large, it will cause vaginal tearing, and poor postpartum recovery will easily lead to uterine prolapse and urinary leakage.
Caesarean section can't complete natural delivery and needs outside help. Postpartum mother recovered more slowly than normal delivery, and there were scars on her stomach. If the first child is delivered by caesarean section, the doctor will recommend that the second child be delivered by caesarean section.
Caesarean section can not go through the process of seeing red, uterine contraction and breaking water. Basically, children can be dissected at full term, not in the real sense.
However, whether the child is smart or not has little to do with caesarean section. IQ is related to genetic factors and the development of acquired education. I had a natural birth, but I don't think I'm smart. On the contrary, I was smart when I had a caesarean section.
So don't worry about the advantages and disadvantages of natural delivery and cesarean section. If your own conditions meet the requirements of natural delivery, natural delivery is better. Anyway, it's the same. The baby was born safely!