The latest regulations issued by the Ministry of Education this time can be said to have changed a lot, on the one hand, because it is necessary to emphasize not only the quality education audit of students, but also the evaluation of teachers. After the news was released, many college students were very concerned. After all, this is related to their graduation. In this latest change, the system of teacher evaluation and education quality assurance in colleges and universities is particularly prominent. Of course, there is also a prominent role, that is, it can emphasize the impact of evaluation results on individuals. These colleges and universities can strictly abide by their own bottom line and ensure that the quality of education cannot be relaxed. So today we will discuss these new changes.

First, five characteristics and four changes.

The reform plan issued by the Ministry of Education has five characteristics and four changes. It can be said that this regulation is not only for undergraduate graduates, but also for teachers in these universities, because there have been too many fraud incidents in colleges and universities. As a result, a large number of students who obviously did not meet the graduation standards flowed into the society. Moreover, many teachers obviously bear the main responsibility for this kind of thing, and it is said that such audit standards will be introduced after the meeting.

Second, what are the functions of these standards?

The main function of these standards is actually to improve the current evaluation function, so that we can realize that we can't graduate directly by simply passing the exam and graduation design, and we need to obtain good evaluation results. In this case, undergraduates' awareness of self-improvement can be strengthened, and university teachers can also understand their responsibilities. Doing so can improve the graduation quality of these undergraduates. You know, because of the enrollment expansion of college students, many people can enter the university through lower scores. However, this may lead many people to graduate smoothly without obtaining the corresponding knowledge reserve in university education. Then the next rule is to raise the threshold. In fact, this can be seen from the sampling inspection of college students' graduation thesis issued by the Ministry of Education.

Third, how to treat this provision?

Although this provision raises the threshold, it also proposes to reduce the burden of evaluation. Reducing the whole evaluation link can let the front-line teachers go deep into the students to evaluate. At the same time, we should also emphasize the role of evaluation when conducting graduation exams. It can be said that he has gradually been compared with our graduation project. Under such circumstances, I also hope that college students can clearly realize this.