Confucius said: it is difficult to teach students, and teaching is not divided, which is the best interpretation of the above viewpoint. As a teacher, after understanding the students, we should make an in-depth analysis of each student and make a targeted teaching plan. I believe everyone will improve in depth;

What I am most afraid of is the teacher's generalities, students' silly listening, cramming and coping with teaching tasks, so many students will definitely fail to keep up or learn well.

Analyzing students is also a scientific research process. Some students like sports, others like art, etc. Guiding learning to learn through interest will certainly achieve results. I hope that our educators will work hard and do a good job of research when they begin to take over, and get twice the result with half the effort.

This is kidnapping a teacher. Teachers' teaching level is important, but not all students can teach well. Some children will be excellent if they don't teach, and some children can't teach even the best teachers. Of the 3000 disciples of Confucius, only 72 can teach better. What kind of educator Confucius is, let alone an ordinary primary teacher like us.

What a good teacher can do in school can only be icing on the cake, that is, to make good children better and poor children not too bad. A bad teacher can't stop a good child from becoming excellent. A good boy can be excellent in any school, and a bad teacher may be a disaster for a bad boy. Whether your child is a good child or a poor child has long been formed in the family of birth, and it only shows up at school.

Therefore, as parents, don't be too persistent in choosing schools for your children. A good school can only make good children better, but it really has little effect on poor children. If you can't send your children to a better school, that's fine. I believe your children will be excellent everywhere.

There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach well. Let me say a few words about this sentence.

In fact, this sentence has been circulating for a long time, for decades. I heard this sentence before I retired, and I believe it myself. Later, I began to doubt the science of this sentence. After that, I didn't believe it at all

Because I have been teaching in the front line for a long time, I have really met some "stupid" students. Parents never feel that their children are "stupid" and never give them reasons. They attribute their children's poor academic performance to the fact that teachers can't teach and teachers have no level.

Of course, I don't deny that excellent teachers have high teaching standards and good teaching methods, and they have indeed turned students with poor academic performance into students with excellent academic performance. However, we have to admit that, really, a student with poor academic performance can't be taught by a special teacher because of his talent, foundation and other reasons.

I have listened to the classes of special teachers, and I have listened to the classes of special teachers. Hundreds of thousands of teachers have to admire his teaching level. A bold teacher asked a special-grade teacher a question and asked him directly if there were any students who could not teach. The super teacher bluntly said: Yes! There is indeed a "yellow mind." No matter what method you use, it has no effect on that student.

It can be said that most teachers are not special-grade teachers, and they can't reach the teaching level of special-grade teachers, including Ye Chao himself. Seeking truth from facts, there are really students who can't be taught. Even if you "cross the sea to show your magical powers", there is nothing you can do. So "only teachers who can't teach and students who can't teach". This sentence is not correct. This board really shouldn't hit the teacher.

Those who say these things are usually administrative leaders who don't attend classes or front-line experts who have left education for many years.

I heard this sentence 20 years ago and took it as truth. Facts have proved that this is nonsense. Whether students teach well or not is not necessarily the teacher's decision, but related to social atmosphere, family education, school qualifications and personal understanding.

How can a family of left-behind children teach well if their parents don't meet for three years? He can succeed without going astray, and he can't achieve the excellent results that experts think.

In a family where the whole family thinks that reading is useless, the children are deaf and deaf, and have no ambition at all. Who can teach?

How can a student who is born with poor qualifications and is a few beats slow let him fly first?

Some people may say: individual counseling, extra meals. This is reasonable, but it is unreasonable. Don't forget how many students a teacher faces. The largest number of junior high school classes I have ever seen is 78 students, not to mention paying attention to guidance, and I can't judge people. Now the class is standardized, with 50 or 60 students.

In addition, students don't want to learn, and teachers insist, which will inevitably lead to tension between teachers and students and may evolve into a contradiction between family and school. Therefore, many teachers settle for the second best and put safety first.

When evaluating students, schools and teachers, we can't just stare at the top classes of famous teachers. If that sentence is true, we might as well change places, teachers change places, good teachers teach poor students in poor classes, urban teachers go to rural schools and so on.

If it is really possible, education will not be difficult.

I think this sentence is too biased!

I have been teaching for decades and have taught countless students. For a time, the above sentence was very popular in education. "There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach well." I also use this to force myself!

I remember there was such a student in my class, and the math teacher responded that he only slept in class! In fact, he is not interested in all subjects, but has a soft spot for sports! When you go to exercise, especially when you have a sports meeting, it's like a different person, full of energy!

From grade one to grade three, I was his head teacher. Every time I go to extracurricular activities, I give him a small stove. I can say that I worked hard for him, but he still achieved little after graduating from junior high school! I am very upset about this!

Later, in the class I took over, there were always some students who couldn't learn, but to some extent, they were not bad! For example, sports, music, art, or labor!

Slowly, I want to open it! Aren't all Confucius disciples who can teach best the same? I am an ordinary junior high school teacher, why should I insist?

As long as under my education and management, my students make progress in a certain aspect, even in a certain place, or even develop to a good side or place, I will succeed as a teacher!

Why are there teachers who can't teach?

I don't mean teachers who can't teach this course, but students who can't!

I used to have colleagues like this around me. Class is like a monk chanting, whether the students listen or not! If the students' exam results are not satisfactory, they will be insulted or even beaten! Don't look for reasons from yourself, teach and educate people better! Such a teacher can't teach!

Of course, most teachers are conscientious, teach and educate people, love life and work, and teach carefully according to the characteristics of students, so they are teachers who can teach; Similarly, as long as students are aggressive and self-motivated, their study and work can make progress year after year, even if they can teach well!

Never across the board! We must admit that there is a gap between students and teachers!

This sentence is nonsense, provided that even the worst students will make progress under ideal conditions, but it is not suitable for classroom teaching, which pays attention to urgent marching. So this sentence is equivalent to empty talk.

Can Zray be trained as Liu Xiang? Can you train Ty Lei Chi Ray to be a boxing Tai Sen? Can you train Ty Lei Chi Ray to be David Jiang? Can you train Zhu Zhiwen to be Jordan? Can Ni Ping be trained as Deng Yaping?

Only fools who don't teach science to senior three students and don't know how to think deeply will swear that "only teachers and students who can't teach".

Talent is always there. You can try to narrow its gap, but you can't ignore its existence.

Both physical strength and intelligence belong to the physiological level, and the innate gap between people is huge.

Take the 100-meter speed of middle school students as an example. They are also untrained. Some students can easily run in 13 seconds or even 12 seconds, and some students can't even run in 15 seconds!

I just didn't pass 100 meter myself. Later, I ran every day and practiced for half a year. I thought I was running fast, but physical education class did make a lot of progress in the exam, but he barely passed!

Later, I was not convinced and continued to train, but it was no less than 15 seconds anyway!

Let's start with the brain. Ordinary people go to a place, if the distance is a little longer, it is not bad to find the way again. However, I read a report that a super brain rode around a city and could remember all the details of the road perfectly when he got home. Note that it is "all details"! Restaurants, shopping malls, haircuts … even a street lamp and a chair along the way …

Let's say that the most difficult last question in the math test paper of the college entrance examination every year, if you explain it to the students of single-recruit colleges and technical schools, believe it or not, at least one-third of the students will never be taught! At most, I will recite the question completely, but I will never fully understand it! !

There is no inseparable marriage, only a mistress who doesn't work hard. There are no teachers who can't teach, only principals who can't manage. There are no incurable diseases, only incurable doctors. There are no unsolved cases, only unsolved policemen. There are no uneducated children, only uneducated parents.

What does this sentence mean? What does it mean that people are divided into three classes? Don't put all the blame on the teacher. There are fifty or sixty students in a class, all taught by the same teacher. How many people finally got into the university?

People who say such things must be people who want to blame the teacher for their children's poor study.