Students should be worried that the tutor will abuse his power, deliberately make things difficult, aggravate the contradiction between teachers and students, and it is difficult to graduate smoothly. First of all, I have to say that it is beneficial to give the tutor the right to decide whether to graduate with a master's degree or not. Judging from the current enrollment, training, management and degree awarding of graduate students, although they are called tutors, they have no autonomy in enrollment, training and deciding whether to graduate. So, it's hard to be a mentor? The first responsible person? . In the process of enrollment, whether it is master's or doctoral enrollment, except for a few schools to explore applications? In addition to the audit system, most schools still take the unified examination results as the basic basis for admission. When enrolling students, tutors can't enroll students independently, and only have limited rights. At the time of training, most of the courses taken by graduate students are compulsory in all disciplines of the school, not decided by the tutor, including the number of papers that must be published during the study period, but also put forward by the school and college, although some tutors do not agree with this. When defending dissertations, schools require blind review of graduate theses, and many universities even set up a tutor avoidance system to prevent unfair evaluation. So, how can a tutor be responsible for the quality of students' training? There are even tutors who help students write papers and turn a blind eye to obvious plagiarism. When training students, it is also difficult for tutors to make personalized plans. Their main duty is to urge students to complete the tasks assigned by schools and colleges. However, this process lacks initiative and enthusiasm, and some just complete the prescribed tasks as tutors. In other words, although the autonomy of training is limited, the tutor's other powers are not small. Now giving the tutor the right to decide the master's and doctor's degree can avoid the above problems, but absolute power leads to absolute corruption? The same is true of tutor autonomy. On the one hand, it is related to whether tutors and graduate students can form a modern and healthy teacher-student relationship and fully protect students' rights and interests, on the other hand, it is related to the quality of postgraduate training and scientific research and academic quality, and neither end can be neglected. In a word, while giving tutors greater autonomy, they should also be supervised and regulated? A spell? . ?