Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Educational institution - Forty years of "burden reduction education" in Japan, what have you got now?
Forty years of "burden reduction education" in Japan, what have you got now?
When it comes to reducing the burden of education, we have to say that Japan has been "reducing the burden of education" for 40 years, from "the dolphin of Heisei" to "the hero of Linghe". What do you have now?

The Japanese people are more and more aware of the benefits brought by science and technology, and also understand the importance of senior intellectuals to the development of a country. So when they have spare money, in addition to the necessary financial investment, the rest of the money will be taken out to invest in the next generation. Every child has to go to high school, college or even study abroad to learn new technologies, which also leads to fierce competition among domestic universities. It is not an exaggeration to say that there is more than one person in a thousand people.

In the forty years of "burden-reducing education" in Japan, most of the educated young people have developed the personality characteristics of being free and easy, muddling along. Because of their parents' doting, they don't care about their work and have no sense of responsibility for their families. They stay at home all day, live a welfare life and inherit their parents' legacy, so the saying "dolphins in Pingcheng" gradually spread. In fact, whether dolphins or heroes, we can't blame this generation of young people because of the stagnation of the times. In the final analysis, there is something wrong with the social system, which is the embodiment of the national policy decision-making mistakes.

Now that we know that Japan's 40-year education burden reduction has brought indelible adverse effects, perhaps we should consider how to deal with the education problems of the next generation.

It's no use just letting it go, because the domestic environment is not as pure and safe as that of parents, and the rapid economic development is bound to bring many temptations, which are obviously beyond the reach of teenagers whose world outlook is not yet fully mature. Secondly, it is inappropriate to put too much pressure on cramming education. Education is people-oriented. If it is based on oppression, I believe that no student will get what really belongs to him. In fact, cramming education is a victim of exam-oriented education. They are often just a problem-solving machine, and they are extremely inexperienced in other aspects, especially in social survival practice. Obviously, these teenagers destined by the framework are not the talents needed for the construction of modern society.

Therefore, education in the new era must conform to the development of the times, achieve a combination of work and rest, match interests with systems, and be able to learn something useful!