First, students are different.
In the early days of private schools, there was no fame, word of mouth and trust, and the students were all left over from public schools. Therefore, as long as they pay money, they can basically go to school. Private schools have flexible mechanisms. After years or years of accumulation, they have gained fame, reputation and trust, and the entrance threshold is getting higher and higher. It is impossible to bring money in.
Just as the teaching quality of public schools is good or bad and the educational resources are unbalanced, the situation of private schools may be more severe according to their own strength differences and the length of schooling.
In this respect, it doesn't make any sense to generalize public and private, and it doesn't make any sense on average, because for each of us, we can only choose a suitable good school for our children in the end.
Second, the student management mode is different.
1, public schools pay attention to common management and treat all students without distinction according to their grades; Private schools, on the other hand, emphasize personalized management and give full play to each student's personality characteristics.
2. Public schools are mainly day schools, and students' effective sleep time is about 6 hours; Private schools are mainly boarding, and children have fixed schedules. The effective sleep time is nearly 10 hour: get up before 7 o'clock in the morning and turn off the lights around 9 o'clock in the evening ... while a water middle school wandering on the edge of public and private has realized militarized management, with students taking less than 6 hours off at night.
3. Mobile phone management. The management of mobile phones in private schools is obviously stricter. Only students can use mobile phones at certain times of the week. When and how long can they play? Their mobile phones are dead. As soon as the business hours arrive, the mobile phone will be taken back for unified management. The management of mobile phones in public schools is much looser. Generally, schools require not to bring mobile phones. If students want to bring mobile phones, the school will require parents to sign a written agreement or commitment letter with the class teacher for their children to use mobile phones.
Students in private schools spend less time on eating and traveling.
Third, the ratio of students to teachers is different.
The ratio of students to teachers is the ratio of students to teachers. The ratio of students to teachers in public schools is 15 in primary schools, 19 in secondary schools, and it is stable at around 13 in private primary and secondary schools. Interestingly, the better the public school, the higher the student-teacher ratio; Private schools are just the opposite.
The essence of student-teacher ratio is that a teacher pays attention to several students on average.
Fourth, the effective learning time is different.
The effective class time for students in public schools is 8 classes a day, 9- 12 classes in private schools (9 classes in the lower grades of primary schools) and 10- 12 classes a day in private middle schools.
Fifth, teachers have different mentality.
Teachers in public schools are stable, difficult to get in and out, with low mobility and lack of sense of crisis. The pressure comes from non-work, short working hours, low average income of teachers after class, little difference in income level, almost the same result of doing more and doing less, leaving work basically does not affect wages, usually working alone, and the quality of work depends more on personal responsibility. Some teachers make up lessons to increase their income.
Teachers in private schools have great mobility, a strong sense of crisis, and great work pressure, and often come in and out. However, the mechanism is flexible and the income difference is large. The average income is almost twice that of public schools. Top teachers earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and their income is linked to teaching quality, popularity among students, student management, attendance and working hours. Therefore, as long as teachers in private schools manage their students well and improve their grades, their income will naturally rise, and teachers have little time and energy to make up lessons outside the school to make money. On the contrary, private schools are understaffed, and teachers from other schools work part-time in private schools.
6. Measuring the quality of teaching is one-sided.
The quality education strongly advocated by the state, when implemented in schools, becomes the evaluation of academic performance. Because of the siphon effect of college entrance examination scores, the college entrance examination lacks more specific and clear implementation norms and admission standards, so it is refined into a lower dimension, and students are recorded according to several dimensions, such as being late and leaving early, being absent from class, dressing, grooming, being polite, speaking in class, winning glory for the class with personal achievements, ups and downs of personal achievements, fighting and quarreling, uniting classmates, and helping others. Private schools, which mainly study abroad, do a better job in shaping students' personality and hobbies because of the comprehensive requirements of foreign universities on students' personality, bilingual speech, exchange and negotiation, writing reports, socialization, emotional intelligence, self-care ability, survival ability, cleanliness, social practice, practical ability, interpersonal adaptability, voluntary service and hobbies.
Seven, the relationship between teachers and students is different.
In public schools, due to the large class size, teachers rarely have time to communicate with each student in depth except for lectures, so it is impossible to know ourselves and teach students in accordance with their aptitude. Teachers give orders more as elders, and achieve the purpose of preaching and dispelling doubts by establishing authority. The students who have a smooth relationship with the teacher are mainly those with good grades, while those with poor grades are more opposed to the teacher. The results ranking measures make the students with poor learning lose face and self-esteem, and the phenomenon of broken cans and broken falls is very serious. Students think that teachers are paid by the state. It is natural for you to educate me, and I am rarely grateful for the teacher's efforts.
In private schools, students and teachers have a dual relationship. On the one hand, parents give money for their children to study, which is an equal consumption mentality. On the other hand, teachers don't regard themselves as elders, but try to keep a low profile, so that they can become one with students and become equal friends with everything. Teachers try their best to attract students, make them close to themselves and like themselves; Otherwise, an unpopular teacher is worthless in a private school because he will offend students and parents who send money to the school.
These relationships determine students' attitudes towards teachers from different levels.