For a long time in the past, due to one-sided emphasis on appreciation education, the management of students by schools and teachers was in an embarrassing situation where they could not manage, dared not manage and were easily accused. Due to the lack of legal weapons to protect themselves, as long as there is a student management dispute, schools and teachers are almost in a weak position and are often sent to the dock. Even if parents are unreasonable, schools and teachers have to sacrifice their own interests and make concessions again and again. Many teachers feel helpless and even "talk about it." The promulgation of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions in Primary and Secondary Education (Trial) has strengthened the backbone and courage of educators and made everyone proud.
Faced with the right to education and punishment, how teachers should use it correctly is indeed a problem worthy of attention. Most educators still agree with the suggestion that teachers' educational punishment rights should be incorporated into the law, and the voice is very high. Generally, some teachers have a high opinion that this is a real endorsement of teachers, and that students can be justified by laws in the future, and they are no longer afraid of gossiping with parents and the public. However, personally, teachers should not have such high expectations for the right to education and punishment. The right of education and punishment is neither a sword nor a panacea. Even if teachers have the right to education and punishment, they cannot use it at will.
The detailed rules seem to be very specific, but the degree of operation is particularly difficult to grasp. As front-line teachers, they are originally vulnerable groups. Once there is friction with parents, it is always the teacher who suffers. As a teacher, we must not rashly implement policies just because the country is introduced. Without the disciplinary power of specific implementation rules, how to make good use of teachers is a difficult problem. Once the operation is improper, it will cause unnecessary trouble because of improper punishment.
For teachers, it is not by blessing the punishment right that students can be persuaded. Even if the future legislation allows teachers to use disciplinary power, it must be used within the framework of legal provisions, rather than arbitrarily.
So how can we make better use of educational punishment to achieve the purpose of education? I think this is also a problem that every educator should face and think about.
First of all, education comes from "love", and the punishment for students must be for the purpose of "love", and students should know it afterwards. If you punish for the sake of punishment, so that students can't feel your care and love, your punishment will not only fail to achieve good results, but will arouse students' resentment, cause hostility between teachers and students, and fail to achieve the purpose of education.
Moreover, the punishment of students must not be carried out in the case of their own emotional excitement. Teachers must learn to control their emotions, let students worry, teachers don't worry, and then deal with them when their emotions calm down. This will be more rational, better able to grasp the sense of proportion, there will be no excessive behavior, will not cause uncontrollable consequences.
In addition, punishment of students should be avoided in public. The ancients in China said that "Yang is good at the imperial court and the rules are too dense". This should also be the criterion for us to discipline students. Punish students as independently as possible. The purpose of punishment is to educate students to abide by rules and discipline and let them correct their mistakes. If students are punished in public, it will make them lose face, which will easily lead to hostility and conflict between teachers and students, or students will simply "break the jar" and it will become more and more difficult to manage.
The implementation plan of educational punishment is like a ruler and a benchmark, so that teachers can really stand up and manage students. Nowadays, the social status of teachers is getting lower and lower, and those students with poor quality can't control them. The personal safety of teachers is even violated by students. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate a certain management plan to improve the social status of teachers and ensure their personal safety. Give some punishment to those students with poor quality and moral corruption, and let them know that some bottom lines can't be touched.
Education is gradual and requires patience, persuasion, guidance and persuasion. The significance of the right to education punishment mainly lies in education, not punishment. Therefore, the purpose of education punishment is to better promote the growth of students, not to subdue them. There is also a saying that it is normal for students to make some mistakes and they need the education and guidance of teachers. If a teacher can walk into the hearts of students and let them really serve you, then the teacher does not need to encourage himself with the right of education and punishment. Therefore, for teachers, it is normal to treat the right of education punishment as much as possible.